NBS1 is required for SPO11-linked DNA double-strand break repair in male meiosis

被引:0
作者
Bin Zhang
Zhenghui Tang
Lejun Li
Lin-Yu Lu
机构
[1] Women’s Hospital,Key Laboratory of Reproductive Genetics (Ministry of Education) and Women’s Reproductive Health Laboratory of Zhejiang Province
[2] Zhejiang University School of Medicine,Institute of Translational Medicine
[3] Zhejiang University School of Medicine,undefined
来源
Cell Death & Differentiation | 2020年 / 27卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) pose a serious threat to genomic stability. Paradoxically, hundreds of programed DSBs are generated by SPO11 in meiotic prophase, which are exclusively repaired by homologous recombination (HR) to promote obligate crossover between homologous chromosomes. In somatic cells, MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 (MRN) complex-dependent DNA end resection is a prerequisite for HR repair, especially for DSBs that are covalently linked with proteins or chemicals. Interestingly, all meiotic DSBs are linked with SPO11 after being generated. Although MRN complex’s function in meiotic DSB repair has been established in lower organisms, the role of MRN complex in mammalian meiotic DSB repair is not clear. Here, we show that MRN complex is essential for repairing meiotic SPO11-linked DSBs in male mice. In male germ cells, conditional inactivation of NBS1, a key component of MRN complex, causes dramatic reduction of DNA end resection and defective HR repair in meiotic prophase. NBS1 loss severely disrupts chromosome synapsis, generates abnormal chromosome structures, and eventually leads to meiotic arrest and male infertility in mice. Unlike in somatic cells, the recruitment of NBS1 to SPO11-linked DSB sites is MDC1-independent but requires other phosphorylated proteins. Collectively, our study not only reveals the significance of MRN complex in repairing meiotic DSBs but also discovers a unique mechanism that recruits MRN complex to SPO11-linked DSB sites.
引用
收藏
页码:2176 / 2190
页数:14
相关论文
共 289 条
[1]  
Ceccaldi R(2016)Repair pathway choices and consequences at the double-strand break Trends Cell Biol 26 52-64
[2]  
Rondinelli B(2019)DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20 698-714
[3]  
D’Andrea AD(2011)Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1 Nature 479 241-4
[4]  
Scully R(2008)Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing Nature 455 770-4
[5]  
Panday A(2008)Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends Cell 134 981-94
[6]  
Elango R(2010)Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA end-resection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nature 467 108-11
[7]  
Willis NA(2017)Dna2 initiates resection at clean DNA double-strand breaks Nucleic Acids Res 45 11766-81
[8]  
Garcia V(2016)Roles of eukaryotic topoisomerases in transcription, replication and genomic stability Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 17 703-21
[9]  
Phelps SE(2010)Androgen-induced TOP2B-mediated double-strand breaks and prostate cancer gene rearrangements Nat Genet 42 668-75
[10]  
Gray S(2019)Topoisomerase II-Induced chromosome breakage and translocation is determined by chromosome architecture and transcriptional activity Mol Cell 75 252-66.e258