Implicit and Explicit Reasons for Driving under the Influence of Alcohol

被引:0
|
作者
Salomón T. [1 ]
Conde K. [1 ]
Peltzer R.I. [1 ]
Biscarra M.A. [1 ]
Cremonte M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Instituto de Psicología Básica, Aplicada & Tecnología (IPSIBAT – UNMdP – CONICET), Dean Funes 3250, Cuerpo V, Nivel III, Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires
关键词
Alcohol; Driving; Dual-process models; Implicit attitudes; Theory of planned behavior;
D O I
10.1007/s43076-022-00144-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Driving under the influence of alcohol is the main risk factor for road traffic accidents. One of the most used models to explain drink driving is the theory of planned behavior (TPB). The TPB postulates that behavior is preceded by the intention to do it, and intention is determined by attitudes, social norms, and perceived behavioral control. However, this model excludes automatic processes such as implicit attitudes. This study aims to determine if implicit attitudes contribute to explain the behavior of driving under the influence of alcohol, beyond the explanatory power of the TPB, and to determine if the role of implicit attitudes varies when driving under the influence of amounts of alcohol below or above the legal limit. A correlational study interviewing 205 Argentinian drivers was conducted. Intention predicted behavior in both cases, and implicit attitudes and perceived behavioral control predicted drink driving below the legal limit. Our results indicate that the inclusion of implicit attitudes contributes to explain this behavior when it is performed under lower doses of alcohol, complementing the rational decision process postulated by the TPB with the analyses of automatic processes. © 2022, Associação Brasileira de Psicologia.
引用
收藏
页码:812 / 822
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Driving under the influence of chlormethiazole
    Jones, AW
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 153 (2-3) : 213 - 217
  • [22] Impairment based legislative limits for driving under the influence of non-alcohol drugs in Norway
    Vindenes, Vigdis
    Jordbru, Dag
    Knapskog, Arne-Birger
    Kvan, Elena
    Mathisrud, Grete
    Slordal, Lars
    Morland, Jorg
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 219 (1-3) : 1 - 11
  • [23] Mindfulness, Explicit and Implicit Alcohol Expectancies in Alcohol Dependent and Non-Alcohol Dependent Adults
    McPherson, Andrew
    Harris, Lynne M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION, 2015, 13 (04) : 457 - 469
  • [24] Mindfulness, Explicit and Implicit Alcohol Expectancies in Alcohol Dependent and Non-Alcohol Dependent Adults
    Andrew McPherson
    Lynne M. Harris
    International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2015, 13 : 457 - 469
  • [25] Predicting dyscontrolled drinking with implicit and explicit measures of alcohol attitude
    Ostafin, Brian D.
    Kassman, Kyle T.
    de Jong, Peter J.
    van Hemel-Ruiter, Madelon E.
    DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2014, 141 : 149 - 152
  • [26] Driving under the influence of alcohol during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Hostiuc, Sorin
    Radu, Doina
    Seretean, Lidia
    Tirdea, Cosmin
    Siminiuc, Razvan
    Curca, George Cristian
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 329
  • [27] Driving under the influence with blood alcohol concentrations over 0.4 g%
    Jones, Alan Wayne
    Harding, Patrick
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 231 (1-3) : 349 - 353
  • [28] How to measure driving ability under the influence of alcohol and drugs, and why
    Brookhuis, K
    HUMAN PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1998, 13 : S64 - S69
  • [29] Driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol: Predicting the intentions of young drivers
    Vankov, Daniel
    Schroeter, Ronald
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2021, 22 (02) : 97 - 101
  • [30] Driving under the influence of alcohol in the Netherlands by time of day and day of the week
    Houwing, Sjoerd
    Stipdonk, Henk
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2014, 72 : 17 - 22