Predicting the effect of substance abuse treatment on probationer recidivism

被引:0
作者
Lattimore P.K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Krebs C.P. [2 ,4 ]
Koetse W. [2 ,4 ]
Lindquist C. [2 ,4 ]
Cowell A.J. [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of South Carolina, Columbia
[2] Health, Social, and Economics Research, RTI International, Res. Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194
[3] Center for the Management of Risk Behavior, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of South Carolina
关键词
Drug treatment; Drug-involved offender; Non-residential substance abuse treatment; Probation; Recidivism;
D O I
10.1007/s11292-005-1617-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Support for the effectiveness of substance abuse treatment to reduce substance use and recidivism among populations supervised by the criminal justice system continues to grow in substance abuse and criminal justice literature. Recent studies show that a variety of programs including the Breaking the Cycle program and drug courts appear to result in improved outcomes for offenders. In this paper, we examine the effect of non-residential substance abuse treatment on arrest. Our data are for almost 134,000 'drug-involved' individuals sentenced to probation in Florida between July 1995 and June 2000. Nearly 52,000 of these individuals received non-residential substance abuse treatment, while 81,797 did not. Our approach is a methodologically simple one that entails stratifying our data by treatment status, estimating logit and negative binomial models of arrest for each of the two datasets, and then applying each model to both datasets. This approach, which requires that both groups include subjects for whom treatment is appropriate, is analogous to using regression models to predict outcomes for new values of independent variables. For each observation in the dataset, we use the models to predict the expected outcomes for each individual under two scenarios - receiving non-residential treatment and receiving no treatment. Summing over these individual estimates provides an estimate of the total numbers of arrests that would be expected under different levels of population exposure to treatment. Results suggest that non-residential treatment reduced both the expected numbers of individuals who recidivated (i.e., were arrested) and the expected total numbers of arrests in the 12 and 24 months following placement on supervision. © Springer 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 189
页数:30
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Anglin D.M., Longshore D., Turner S., McBride D., Inciardi J., Prendergast M., Studies of the Functioning and Effectiveness of Treatment Alternatives to Street Crime (TASC) Programs: Final Report, (1996)
  • [2] Banks D., Gottfredson D.C., The effects of drug treatment and supervision on time to rearrest among drug treatment court participants, Journal of Drug Issues, 33, 2, pp. 385-412, (2003)
  • [3] Belenko S., Research on Drug Courts: A Critical Review 2001 Update, (2001)
  • [4] Berk R.A., Causal inference as a prediction problem, Prediction and Classification: Criminal Justice Decision Making, pp. 183-200, (1987)
  • [5] Bonta J., Law M., Hanson K., The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 123, pp. 123-142, (1998)
  • [6] Brewster M.P., An evaluation of the Chester County (PA) drug court program, Journal of Drug Issues, 31, 1, pp. 177-206, (2001)
  • [7] Characteristics of Adults on Probation, 1995, (1995)
  • [8] Probation and Parole in the United States, 2002, (2003)
  • [9] Prisoners in 2002, (2003)
  • [10] Chanhatasilpa C., MacKenzie D.L., Hickman L.J., The effectiveness of community-based programs for chemically dependent offenders: A review and assessment of the research, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 19, pp. 383-393, (2000)