The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) in the Detection, Evaluation, and Surveillance of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa)

[1] Moore CM(2013)Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an international working group Eur Urol 64 544-552

[2] Kasivisvanathan V(2019)National survey of patterns employing targeted MRI/US guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer Curr Urol 21201 97-103

[3] Eggener S(2017)Role of mpMRI of the prostate in screening for prostate cancer Transl Androl Urol [Internet] 6 464-471

[4] Emberton M(2012)Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort Eur Urol 61 177-184

[5] Fütterer JJ(2013)Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review Eur Urol 63 125-140

[6] Gill IS(2013)Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer J Urol [Internet]. Elsevier Inc 190 502-508

[7] Grubb III RL(2013)Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer J Urol [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd 190 1721-1727

[8] Hadaschik B(2014)The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level-Can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer? Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig [Internet]. Elsevier 32 45.e17-45.e22

[9] Klotz L(2014)Performance of multiparametric MRI in men at risk of prostate cancer before the first biopsy: a paired validating cohort study using template prostate mapping biopsies as the reference standard Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 17 40-46

[10] Margolis DJA(2014)Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study J Urol 192 67-74

[1] Moore CM(2013)Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an international working group Eur Urol 64 544-552

[2] Kasivisvanathan V(2019)National survey of patterns employing targeted MRI/US guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer Curr Urol 21201 97-103

[3] Eggener S(2017)Role of mpMRI of the prostate in screening for prostate cancer Transl Androl Urol [Internet] 6 464-471

[4] Emberton M(2012)Prospective assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using 3-T diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies versus a systematic 10-core transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy cohort Eur Urol 61 177-184

[5] Fütterer JJ(2013)Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review Eur Urol 63 125-140

[6] Gill IS(2013)Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer J Urol [Internet]. Elsevier Inc 190 502-508

[7] Grubb III RL(2013)Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer J Urol [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd 190 1721-1727

[8] Hadaschik B(2014)The accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men with negative biopsy and elevated PSA level-Can it rule out clinically significant prostate cancer? Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig [Internet]. Elsevier 32 45.e17-45.e22

[9] Klotz L(2014)Performance of multiparametric MRI in men at risk of prostate cancer before the first biopsy: a paired validating cohort study using template prostate mapping biopsies as the reference standard Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 17 40-46

[10] Margolis DJA(2014)Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study J Urol 192 67-74