RET Rearrangement as a Predictor of Unresponsiveness to Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Report of Two Cases with Review of the Literature

被引:0
作者
Sara Baglivo
Vienna Ludovini
Riccardo Moretti
Guido Bellezza
Angelo Sidoni
Fausto Roila
Giulio Metro
机构
[1] Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia,Laboratory of Oncology, Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital
[2] Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia,Department of Radiology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital
[3] University of Perugia Medical School,Department of Experimental Medicine, Division of Pathology and Histology
[4] Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia,Medical Oncology, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital
来源
Oncology and Therapy | 2020年 / 8卷
关键词
Hyper-progressive disease; Immunotherapy; Non-small cell lung cancer; PD-L1 ≥ 50%; Pembrolizumab; RET;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) generally respond poorly to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) given with or without anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) drugs. However, the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC harboring minor drivers, such as fusions in the rearranged during transfection (RET) gene, is still unclear. Here we describe two patients with RET-positive advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% who developed progressive disease during first-line treatment with the anti-PD-1 agent pembrolizumab. In particular, while patient 2 was immediately switched to treatment with a selective RET inhibitor within the setting of a clinical trial, patient 1 responded to cytotoxic chemotherapy delivered at the time of progression while on pembrolizumab. These cases of NSCLC are discussed in the context of current literature, which seems to support our observation that patients with RET-positive NSCLC are unlikely to benefit from immunotherapy. Therefore, we suggest that for RET-positive patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, consideration should be given to upfront treatment approaches other than single-agent immunotherapy, namely selective RET inhibitors (if available) or regimens including cytotoxic chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 339
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Dong J(2019)Advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer based on accurate molecular typing Front Pharmacol 10 230-1221
[2]  
Li B(2020)State-of-the-art strategies for targeting RET-dependent cancers J Clin Oncol 38 1209-S7
[3]  
Lin D(2019)Clinical activity and tolerability of BLU-667, a highly potent and selective RET inhibitor in patients (pts) with advanced RET-fusion+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) J Clin Oncol 37 abstract 9008-S296
[4]  
Zhou Q(2019)Registrational results of LIBRETTO-001: a phase 1/2 trial of LOXO-292 in patients with RET fusion-positive lung cancers J Thorac Oncol. 14 abstract S6-1291
[5]  
Huang D(2018)Cons: should immunotherapy be incorporated in the treatment of oncogene-driven lung cancer? Transl Lung Cancer Res 7 S294-601
[6]  
Subbiah V(2016)Clinical outcomes with pemetrexed-based systemic therapies in RET-rearranged lung cancers Ann Oncol 27 1286-1328
[7]  
Yang D(2020)Characteristics and outcomes of RET-rearranged Korean non-small cell lung cancer patients in real-world practice Jpn J Clin Oncol. 50 594-636
[8]  
Velcheti V(2019)Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced lung cancer and oncogenic driver alterations: results from the IMMUNOTARGET registry Ann Oncol 30 1321-6650
[9]  
Drilon A(2020)Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer with BRAF, HER2 or MET mutation or RET-translocation. GFPC 01-2018 J Thorac Oncol. 15 628-undefined
[10]  
Meric-Bernstam F(2019)When to consider immune checkpoint inhibitors in oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer? Curr Treat Options Oncol 20 60-undefined