Direct Quantification of Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Fecal Samples Using Real-Time PCR: Evaluation of Six Rapid DNA Extraction Methods

被引:0
作者
Ana B. Garcia
Judy N. Kamara
Håkan Vigre
Jeffrey Hoorfar
Mathilde H. Josefsen
机构
[1] Denmark Technical University,Division of Epidemiology and Microbial Genomics, National Food Institute
来源
Food Analytical Methods | 2013年 / 6卷
关键词
Quantification; Chickens; Real-time PCR; DNA extraction methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Direct and accurate quantification of Campylobacter in poultry is crucial for the assessment of public health risks and the evaluation of the effectiveness of control measures against Campylobacter in poultry. The aim of this study was to assess several rapid DNA extraction methods for their effectiveness for the direct quantification (without enrichment) of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken fecal samples using real-time PCR. The presence of inhibitory substances in chicken fecal samples may reduce or even completely impede the PCR amplification process making quantification very difficult. Six rapid DNA extraction methods were compared based on their limit of detection, efficiency, reproducibility, and precision. Standard curves were designed for all the methods tested in order to assess their performance on the direct quantification of C. jejuni in chicken fecal samples. As a result of this study, the Easy-DNA (Invitrogen) method generated lower Ct values, the best amplification efficiency (AE = 93.2 %) and good precision (R squared = 0.996). The method NucleoSpin® Tissue was able to detect samples spiked with the lowest Campylobacter concentration level (10 CFU/ml) but the amplification efficiency was not optimal (AE = 139.5 %). DNA extraction methods Easy-DNA Invitrogen, MiniMAG® and NucleoSpin® Tissue produced good real-time PCR reproducibility generating standard deviations from 0.3 to 0.8 between replicates.
引用
收藏
页码:1728 / 1738
页数:10
相关论文
共 348 条
[11]  
Erkkila MJ(1992)Optimization of PCR based detection of human papillomavirus DNA from urine specimens Biotechniques 12 332-334
[12]  
Armbruster DA(2010)Critical points of DNA quantification by real-time PCR – effects of DNA extraction method and sample matrix on quantification of genetically modified organisms J Immunol Methods 354 34-39
[13]  
Pry T(2010)Development of a combined selection and enrichment PCR procedure for Virol J 7 260-412
[14]  
Barnard TG(2007) types B, E and F and its use to determine prevalence in fecal samples from slaughter pigs Res Microbiol 158 405-1188
[15]  
Robertson CA(2012)The effects of plant polysaccharides and buffer additives on PCR Expert Rev Vaccines 11 1179-5
[16]  
Jagals P(2004)Comparison of different standards for real-time PCR-based absolute quantification Rev Argent Microbiol 36 1-5185
[17]  
Potgieter N(2003)Simultaneous detection and differentiation by multiplex real time RT-PCR of highly pathogenic avian influenza subtype H5N1 classic (clade 2.2.1 proper) and escape mutant (clade 2.2.1 variant) lineages in Egypt Appl Environ Microbiol 69 5178-4113
[18]  
Botteldoorn N(2000)Insufficient differentiation of live and dead J Clin Microbiol 38 4108-507
[19]  
Van Coillie E(2004) and Sex Transm Dis 31 499-1141
[20]  
Piessens V(2005) cells by ethidium monoazide (EMA) compromises EMA/real-time PCR Appl Environ Microbiol 71 1135-828