Direct Quantification of Campylobacter jejuni in Chicken Fecal Samples Using Real-Time PCR: Evaluation of Six Rapid DNA Extraction Methods

被引:0
作者
Ana B. Garcia
Judy N. Kamara
Håkan Vigre
Jeffrey Hoorfar
Mathilde H. Josefsen
机构
[1] Denmark Technical University,Division of Epidemiology and Microbial Genomics, National Food Institute
来源
Food Analytical Methods | 2013年 / 6卷
关键词
Quantification; Chickens; Real-time PCR; DNA extraction methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Direct and accurate quantification of Campylobacter in poultry is crucial for the assessment of public health risks and the evaluation of the effectiveness of control measures against Campylobacter in poultry. The aim of this study was to assess several rapid DNA extraction methods for their effectiveness for the direct quantification (without enrichment) of Campylobacter jejuni in chicken fecal samples using real-time PCR. The presence of inhibitory substances in chicken fecal samples may reduce or even completely impede the PCR amplification process making quantification very difficult. Six rapid DNA extraction methods were compared based on their limit of detection, efficiency, reproducibility, and precision. Standard curves were designed for all the methods tested in order to assess their performance on the direct quantification of C. jejuni in chicken fecal samples. As a result of this study, the Easy-DNA (Invitrogen) method generated lower Ct values, the best amplification efficiency (AE = 93.2 %) and good precision (R squared = 0.996). The method NucleoSpin® Tissue was able to detect samples spiked with the lowest Campylobacter concentration level (10 CFU/ml) but the amplification efficiency was not optimal (AE = 139.5 %). DNA extraction methods Easy-DNA Invitrogen, MiniMAG® and NucleoSpin® Tissue produced good real-time PCR reproducibility generating standard deviations from 0.3 to 0.8 between replicates.
引用
收藏
页码:1728 / 1738
页数:10
相关论文
共 348 条
  • [1] Abu Al-Soud W(1998)Capacity of nine thermostable DNA polymerases to mediate DNA amplification in the presence of PCR-inhibiting samples Appl Environ Microbiol 64 3748-3753
  • [2] Rådström P(2000)Effects of amplification facilitators on diagnostic PCR in the presence of blood, feces, and meat J Clin Microbiol 38 4463-4470
  • [3] Abu Al-Soud W(2005)Characterization of the PCR inhibitory effect of bile to optimize real-time PCR detection of FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 44 177-182
  • [4] Rådström P(1993) species PCR Methods Appl 3 65-68
  • [5] Abu Al-Soud W(2008)Interference of PCR amplification by the polyamines, spermine and spermidine Clin Biochem Rev 29 S49-S52
  • [6] Ouis IS(2011)Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation Afr J Biotechnol 10 1485-1490
  • [7] Li DQ(2008)A rapid and low-cost DNA extraction method for isolating J Appl Microbiol 105 1909-1918
  • [8] Ljungh A(2004) DNA from animal stools J Clin Virol 29 230-240
  • [9] Wadström T(2006)Quantification of BMC Biotechnol 14 37-51
  • [10] Ahokas H(2001) spp. in chicken carcass rinse by real-time PCR Appl Environ Microbiol 67 4781-4789