Formulation in eating disorder focused family therapy: why, when and how?

被引:0
作者
Julian Baudinet
Mima Simic
Ivan Eisler
机构
[1] Maudsley Hospital,Maudsley Centre for Child and Adolescent Eating Disorders (MCCAED)
[2] Institute of Psychiatry,undefined
[3] Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN),undefined
[4] King’s College London,undefined
来源
Journal of Eating Disorders | / 9卷
关键词
Formulation; Maudsley family therapy; FT-AN; FT-BN; Family based treatment; FBT; Anorexia nervosa; Bulimia nervosa; Adolescent;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the broadest sense, formulation, or case conceptualisation, is the process of collaborative sense-making. It is something all clinicians are doing constantly, whether formally and consciously or not. Most clinicians are familiar with the general principals and need to formulate as it is a core part of clinical training across most disciplines. Treatment manuals often discuss formulation, but the practical steps involved and the process of developing, building upon and revising formulations are not always provided. In clinical practice, the active use and continued development of formulation during treatment is not always prioritised, especially beyond the initial assessment. This could be due to a number of reasons, such as a potential lack of clarity, understanding or confidence in the use of formulation across treatment, a lack of dedicated time and reflective space for formulation in the context of increasingly busy clinical settings, or a perception that it may be less necessary in the context of treatment approaches that are more structured and prescriptive. This article outlines the use of formulation in family therapy for child and adolescent eating disorders, provides guidance on how to actively include formulation more throughout treatment and discusses why this might be useful.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 129 条
[1]  
Harper D(2003)A different kind of chemistry? Reformulating ‘formulation’ Clin Psychol 25 6-10
[2]  
Moss D(2017)Complexity in eating disorders: a case for simple or complex formulation and treatment? Cogn Behav Ther 10 e14-46
[3]  
Mountford VA(2018)Psychological formulation as an alternative to psychiatric diagnosis J Humanist Psychol 58 30-103
[4]  
Tatham M(2017)Clinical formulation: where it came from, what it is and why it matters BJPsych Adv 23 95-371
[5]  
Turner H(2018)Meta-analysis of the alliance–outcome relation in couple and family therapy Psychotherapy. 55 356-215
[6]  
Waller G(2018)A systematic review of team formulation in clinical psychology practice: definition, implementation, and outcomes Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract 91 186-34
[7]  
Johnstone L(2014)Team formulation: what are staff views? Clin Psychol Forum 257 28-435
[8]  
Baird J(2012)‘Chipping in’: clinical psychologists’ descriptions of their use of formulation in multidisciplinary team working: Psychol Psychother Theory Res Pract 85 424-22
[9]  
Hyslop A(2016)Treatment protocols for eating disorders: clinicians’ attitudes, concerns, adherence and difficulties delivering evidence-based psychological interventions Curr Psychiatry Rep 18 36-216
[10]  
Macfie M(2010)Integrating psychological formulations into older people’s service-three years on (part 3): staff perceptions of formulation meetings PSIGE Newsl 112 16-100