Minimally invasive approach to incisional hernia in elective and emergency surgery: a SICE (Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies) and ISHAWS (Italian Society of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery) online survey

被引:0
作者
Lorenzo Crepaz
Alberto Sartori
Mauro Podda
Monica Ortenzi
Alberto Di Leo
Cesare Stabilini
Michele Carlucci
Stefano Olmi
机构
[1] San Camillo Hospital,General and Mini
[2] Ospedale Di Montebelluna,Invasive Surgery
[3] University of Cagliari,Department of General Surgery
[4] Università Politecnica Delle Marche,Department of Surgical Science
[5] University of Genoa,Department of General Surgery
[6] IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital,DISC (Department of Surgical Sciences)
[7] Policlinico San Marco GSD,General and Emergency Surgery
来源
Updates in Surgery | 2023年 / 75卷
关键词
Survey; Incisional hernia; Emergency; Laparoscopy; Mesh;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Minimally invasive abdominal wall surgery is growing worldwide, with a constant and fast improvement of surgical techniques and surgeons’ confidence in treating both primary and incisional hernias (IH). The Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and new technologies (SICE) and the ISHAWS (Italian Society of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery) worked together to investigate state of the art in IH treatment in elective and emergency settings in Italy. An online open survey was designed, and Italian surgeons interested in abdominal wall surgery were invited to fill out a 20-point questionnaire on IH surgical procedures performed in their departments. Surgeons were asked to express their points of view on specific questions about technical and clinical variables in IH treatment. Preferred approach in elective IH surgery was minimally invasive (59.7%). Open surgery was the preferred approach in 40.3% of the responses. In emergency settings, open surgery was the preferred approach (65.4%); however, 34.5% of the involved surgeons declare to prefer the laparoscopic/endoscopic approach. Most respondents opted for conversion to open surgery in case of relevant surgical field contamination, with a non-mesh repair of abdominal wall defects. Among those that used the laparoscopic approach in the emergent setting, the majority (74%) used the size of the defect of 5 cm as a decisional cut-off. The spread of minimally invasive approaches to IH repair in emergency surgery in Italy is gaining relevance. Code-sharing through scientific societies can improve clinical practice in different departments and promote a tailored approach to IH surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1671 / 1680
页数:9
相关论文
共 95 条
[11]  
O'Malley AJ(2018)Laparoscopic versus open emergent ventral hernia repair: utilization and outcomes analysis using the ACSNSQIP database Surg Endosc 32 4999-5005
[12]  
Cotterill P(2022)Biologic vs synthetic mesh for single-stage repair of contaminated ventral hernias: a randomized clinical trial JAMA Surg 157 293-301
[13]  
Landon BE(2022)Comment on use of biologic vs synthetic mesh for single-stage repair of contaminated ventral Hernias JAMA Surg 157 854-655
[14]  
Swank HA(2021)Preventing recurrence in clean and contaminated hernias using biologic versus synthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair: the PRICE randomized clinical trial Ann Surg 273 648-undefined
[15]  
Mulder IM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[16]  
la Chapelle CF(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[17]  
Reitsma JB(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[18]  
Lange JF(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[19]  
Bemelman WA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[20]  
Daes J(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined