Efficacy and Safety of Nivestim Versus Neupogen for Mobilization of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

被引:0
作者
Cindy Chew
Hong Yen Ng
机构
[1] National Cancer Centre,Department of Pharmacy
[2] Singapore General Hospital,Department of Pharmacy
来源
Scientific Reports | / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A retrospective cohort study was conducted in Singapore General Hospital to study the safety and efficacy of biosimilar granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) Nivestim for chemo-mobilization of stem cells for autologous stem cell transplant (autoSCT). All patients who underwent an autoSCT between January 2011 and December 2016 were screened for eligibility. A total of 194 patients were screened, and 131 were included. Nivestim was used in 65 patients and the originator G-CSF (Neupogen) in 66. Patient characteristics were similar between both arms except for chemo-mobilization regimen used (p < 0.0001). Mobilization success rates were found to be comparable, at 96.9% (Nivestim) and 97% (Neupogen). Adverse events rates were also similar. Median duration of G-CSF use and hospitalization were both found to be shorter in the Nivestim arm. Median drug acquisition cost per mobilization cycle was significantly lower in the Nivestim arm at $533.40 (range $213.40–$1280.20) as compared to $1261.90 (range $574–$2755.20) in the Neupogen arm (p < 0.0001). No difference was observed for neutrophil and platelet engraftment after autoSCT. Nivestim was found to be safe and non-inferior to Neupogen for chemo-mobilization of stem cells for autoSCT, and associated with lower cost and shorter length of hospitalization.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Gratwohl A(2004)Hematopoetic stem cell transplantation for solid tumors in Europe Ann Oncol. 15 653-60
[2]  
Dhakal B(2018)Autologous Transplantation for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Agent Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis JAMA Oncol. 4 343-50
[3]  
Philip T(1995)Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma N Engl J Med. 333 1540-5
[4]  
Weise M(2012)Biosimilars: what clinicians should know Blood. 120 5111-7
[5]  
Engert A(2009)Incidence of febrile neutropenia and myelotoxicity of chemotherapy: a meta-analysis of biosimilar G-CSF studies in breast cancer, lung cancer, and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma Onkologie. 32 599-604
[6]  
Abraham I(2013)Clinical safety of biosimilar recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factors Expert Opin Drug Saf. 12 235-46
[7]  
Tharmarajah S(2015)Biosimilar granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of autologous peripheral blood stem cells in pediatric hematology-oncology patients Transfusion. 55 246-52
[8]  
MacDonald K(2010)Comparison of the pharmacodynamic profiles of a biosimilar filgrastim and Amgen filgrastim: results from a randomized, phase I trial Ann Hematol. 89 971-8
[9]  
Cesaro S(2010)Pharmacokinetic profiles of a biosimilar filgrastim and Amgen filgrastim: results from a randomized, phase I trial Ann Hematol. 89 927-33
[10]  
Waller CF(2014)Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation with biosimilar rhG-CSF Adv Ther. 31 451-60