Critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research studies

被引:49
|
作者
Treloar C. [3 ]
Champness S. [1 ]
Simpson P.L. [2 ]
Higginbotham N. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, The University of Newcastle, Concord West
[2] Child Adolescent and Family Psychiatric Services, Thomas Walker Hospital, Concord West
[3] Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Newcastie, NSW
关键词
Critical appraisal; Epidemiological research; Qualitative methods;
D O I
10.1007/BF02820685
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The ability to critically appraise literature is an essential skill for clinicians adopting a population perspective. Conventions exist for reporting and evaluating the quality of quantitative and epidemiological research. The same traditions do not exist in qualitative research for a number of reasons including the number of theories under which this type of research can be conducted and the subsequent incompatibility of indicators of quality. This paper presents a 10-point checklist for assessing the quality of qualitative research in clinical epidemiological studies. We aim to provide a framework for critical appraisal as well as offer direction for qualitative researchers in designing and publishing their work.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 351
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A checklist for critical appraisal of studies of biological variation
    Bartlett, William A.
    Braga, Federica
    Carobene, Anna
    Coskun, Abdurrahman
    Prusa, Richard
    Fernandez-Calle, Pilar
    Roraas, Thomas
    Jonker, Neils
    Sandberg, Sverre
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 53 (06) : 879 - 885
  • [2] Countertransference in qualitative research: a critical appraisal
    Holmes, Joshua
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, 2014, 14 (02) : 166 - 183
  • [3] Qualitative Research in Nephrology: An Introduction to Methods and Critical Appraisal
    Amir, Noa
    McCarthy, Hugh J.
    Tong, Allison
    KIDNEY360, 2021, 2 (04): : 737 - 741
  • [4] Reflections on critical appraisal of research for qualitative evidence synthesis
    Small, Sandra P.
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (06) : 1064 - 1065
  • [5] Critical appraisal of qualitative research in clinical journals challenged
    Sale, JEM
    Hawker, GA
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2005, 53 (02): : 314 - 316
  • [6] A checklist for critical appraisal of indirect comparisons
    Ortega, A.
    Fraga, M. D.
    Alegre-del-Rey, E. J.
    Puigventos-Latorre, F.
    Porta, A.
    Ventayol, P.
    Tenias, J. M.
    Hawkins, N. S.
    Caldwell, D. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 68 (10) : 1181 - 1189
  • [7] Critical appraisal of interventional radiology research studies
    Shannon, S
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2002, 53 (03): : 133 - 135
  • [8] Critical appraisal of qualitative research: necessity, partialities and the issue of bias
    Williams, Veronika
    Boylan, Anne-Marie
    Nunan, David
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2020, 25 (01) : 9 - 11
  • [9] Critical appraisal for public health: A new checklist
    Heller, Richard F.
    Verma, Arpana
    GemmeH, Islay
    Harrison, Roger
    Hart, Judy
    Edwards, Richard
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2008, 122 (01) : 92 - 98
  • [10] The Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist: A Standard for Evaluating Studies on Biological Variation
    Aarsand, Aasne K.
    Roraas, Thomas
    Fernandez-Calle, Pilar
    Ricos, Carmen
    Diaz-Garzon, Jorge
    Jonker, Niels
    Perich, Carmen
    Gonzalez-Lao, Elisabet
    Carobene, Anna
    Minchinela, Joana
    Coskun, Abdurrahman
    Simon, Margarita
    Alvarez, Virtudes
    Bartlett, William A.
    Fernandez-Fernandez, Pilar
    Boned, Beatriz
    Braga, Federica
    Corte, Zoraida
    Aslan, Berna
    Sandberg, Sverre
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2018, 64 (03) : 501 - 514