Applying Behavioural Insights to Public Policy: An Example From Rotterdam

被引:0
作者
Malte Dewies
Semiha Denktaş
Lisenne Giel
Gera Noordzij
Inge Merkelbach
机构
[1] Erasmus University Rotterdam,Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences
来源
Global Implementation Research and Applications | 2022年 / 2卷 / 1期
关键词
Behavioural Insights Group Rotterdam; BIT; Nudge; Policy design; Collaboration; Behavioural public policy;
D O I
10.1007/s43477-022-00036-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Worldwide, scholars and public institutions are embracing behavioural insights to improve public policy. Multiple frameworks exist to describe the integration of behavioural insights into policy, and behavioural insights teams (BITs) have specialised in this. Yet, it often remains unclear how these frameworks can be applied and by whom. Here, we describe and discuss a comprehensive framework that describes who does what and when to integrate behavioural insights into policy. The framework is informed by relevant literature, theorising, and experience with one BIT, the Behavioural Insights Group Rotterdam. We discuss how the framework helps to overcome some challenges associated with integrating behavioural insights into policy (an overreliance on randomised control trials, a limited understanding of context, threats to good scientific practice, and bounded rationality of individuals applying behavioural insights).
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 66
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Challenges in applying design thinking to public policy: dealing with the varieties of policy formulation and their vicissitudes [J].
Howlett, Michael .
POLICY AND POLITICS, 2020, 48 (01) :49-65
[22]   Lasswell's legacy revisited: critical perspectives on psychological and behavioural public policy [J].
Strassheim, Holger .
CRITICAL POLICY STUDIES, 2019, 13 (02) :221-225
[23]   The intersection of climate technology and public diplomacy: Insights into policy and implementation [J].
Song, Jaeryoung .
SUSTAINABLE FUTURES, 2025, 9
[24]   How can better monitoring, reporting and evaluation standards advance behavioural public policy? [J].
Cotterill, Sarah ;
John, Peter ;
Johnston, Marie .
POLICY AND POLITICS, 2021, 49 (01) :161-179
[25]   Questioning post-political perspectives on the psychological state: Behavioural public policy in the Netherlands [J].
Whitehead, Mark ;
Ones, Rhys ;
Pykett, Essica .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-POLITICS AND SPACE, 2020, 38 (02) :214-232
[26]   Unpacking the contextualities of behavioural public policy: a case study of the Peruvian Nudge unit MineduLAB [J].
Nanez, Paola ;
Decuypere, Mathias ;
Hartong, Sigrid .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2024,
[27]   The boundaries of Behavioural Insights: observations from two ethnographic studies [J].
Ball, Sarah ;
Feitsma, Joram .
EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2020, 16 (04) :559-577
[28]   Networks and efficient policy implementation: Insights from cohesion policy [J].
Boumans, Dorine ;
Ferry, Martin .
EVALUATION, 2019, 25 (04) :411-429
[29]   Insights from behavioural economics for forest economics and environmental policy: Potential nudges to encourage woodland creation for climate change mitigation and adaptation? [J].
Valatin, Gregory ;
Moseley, Darren ;
Dandy, Norman .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2016, 72 :27-36
[30]   De-biasing democracy. Behavioural public policy and the post-democratic turn [J].
Strassheim, Holger .
DEMOCRATIZATION, 2020, 27 (03) :461-476