Mobile telecommunication standardization in Japan, China, the United States, and Europe: a comparison of regulatory and industrial regimes

被引:0
作者
G. van de Kaa
M. J. Greeven
机构
[1] Delft University of Technology,
[2] Zhejiang University,undefined
[3] School of Management,undefined
来源
Telecommunication Systems | 2017年 / 65卷
关键词
Telecommunication; Standards; Regulatory regime; Industrial regime;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The process that leads to standardization in the mobile telecommunication industry has changed considerably over time. Where it was first a national process, it has gradually changed into a more global process, and the role of the government in the standardization process has changed from very influential to less influential. The role of the government now mainly consists of creating boundary conditions such as competition rules and granting licenses to operate. Finally, the number of stakeholders involved in the standardization process had increased considerably from stand-alone development of the standard to a situation in which a multitude of companies work together to develop standards. The purpose of this paper is to create insight in the changes in standardization processes in mobile telecommunication. We analyze existing theory on standardization and dominant designs and construct a framework which includes geographic setting, governmental regimes and industrial regimes. We test this framework by analyzing the standardization processes of four generations of mobile telecommunication standards in four regions (i.e., Japan, China, the US, and Europe).
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 192
页数:11
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]  
Kano S(2000)Technical innovations, standardization and regional comparison: A case study in mobile communications Telecommunication Policy 24 305-321
[2]  
Lyytinen K(2002)Achieving high momentum in the evolution of wireless infrastructures: The battle over 1G solutions Telecommunications Policy 26 149-170
[3]  
Fomin VV(1985)Standardization, compatibility, and innovation The RAND Journal of Economics 16 70-83
[4]  
Farrell J(1985)Network externalities, competition, and compatibility American Economic Review 75 424-440
[5]  
Saloner G(1998)Technological lockout: An integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure Academy of Management Review 23 267-284
[6]  
Katz ML(2002)Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: The impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities Academy of Management Journal 45 387-398
[7]  
Shapiro C(2004)Battles for technological dominance: An integrative framework Research Policy 33 271-286
[8]  
Schilling MA(2015)Factors for winning format battles: A comparative case study Technological Forecasting and Social Change 91 222-235
[9]  
Schilling MA(2011)Factors for winning interface format battles: A review and synthesis of the literature Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 1397-1411
[10]  
Suarez FF(2002)Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure: The case of GSM Research Policy 31 1141-1161