A comparison of patients with relapsed and chemo-refractory gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

被引:0
作者
T Powles
P M Savage
J Stebbing
D Short
A Young
M Bower
C Pappin
P Schmid
M J Seckl
机构
[1] Charing Cross Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Centre,Department of Medical Oncology
[2] Hammersmith Hospitals Campus of Imperial College London,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2007年 / 96卷
关键词
gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; relapse; chemotherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The majority of women requiring chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic disease (GTN) are cured with their initial chemotherapy treatment. However, a small percentage either become refractory to treatment, or relapse after the completion of treatment. This study investigates the characteristics and outcome of these patients. Patients were identified from the Charing Cross Hospital GTD database. The outcome of these patients with relapsed disease was compared to those with refractory disease. Between 1980 and 2004, 1708 patients were treated with chemotherapy for GTN. Sixty (3.5%) patents relapsed following completion of initial therapy. The overall 5-year survival for patients with relapsed GTN was 93% (95% CI 86–100%). The overall survival for patients with low-risk and high-risk disease at presentation, who subsequently relapsed was 100% (n=35), and 84% (n=25) (95% CI: 66–96%: P<0.05), respectively. Eleven patients were identified who failed to enter remission and had refractory disease. These patients had a worse outcome compared to patients with relapsed disease (5-year survival 43% (95% CI:12–73% P<0.01)). The outcome of patients with relapsed GTN is good. However, patients with primary chemo-refractory disease do poorly and novel therapies are required for this group of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 737
页数:5
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Bagshawe KD(1976)Risk and prognostic factors in trophoblastic neoplasia Cancer 3 1373-1385
[2]  
Bower M(1997)EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors: results from a cohort of 272 patients J Clin Oncol 15 2636-2643
[3]  
Newlands ES(2000)Persistent gestational trophoblastic disease: results of MEA (methotrexate, etoposide and dactinomycin) as first-line chemotherapy in high risk disease and EA (etoposide and dactinomycin) as second-line therapy for low risk disease Br J Cancer 82 1547-1552
[4]  
Holden L(1996)Cisplatin and ifosfamide with either vinblastine or etoposide as salvage therapy for refractory or relapsing germ cell tumor patients: the Institut Gustave Roussy experience Cancer 77 1193-1197
[5]  
Short D(1992)The prognostic significance of prostate specific antigen in metastatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer Br J Cancer 66 181-184
[6]  
Brock C(1998)Gestational trophoblastic disease. Molecular and genetic studies J Reprod Med 43 87-97
[7]  
Rustin GJ(2002)Update on the role of topotecan in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer Oncologist 7 3-10
[8]  
Begent RH(2001)The new FIGO 2000 staging and risk factor scoring system for gestational trophoblastic disease: description and critical assessment Int J Gynecol Cancer 11 73-77
[9]  
Bagshawe KD(2005)Secondary chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia Gynecol Oncol 97 618-623
[10]  
Dobson LS(2005)Relapse rate of patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic tumor initially treated with single-agent chemotherapy Gynecol Oncol 96 616-620