Using the Synthetic Control Method to Determine the Effect of Ultrasound Laws on State-Level Abortion Rates

被引:0
作者
Mark Gius
机构
[1] Quinnipiac University,Department of Economics
来源
Atlantic Economic Journal | 2019年 / 47卷
关键词
Abortion; Ultrasound laws; Synthetic control method; I18;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of the present study is to determine if laws requiring ultrasounds prior to an abortion being performed have any effect on the demand for abortions. Using state-level data, a synthetic control model (SCM) and a fixed effects model, results of the present study suggest that ultrasound laws have no statistically-significant effects on state-level abortion rates. In the SCM analysis, 21 states were in the treatment group (state had enacted an ultrasound law) and 22 states were in the potential control group. Results also suggest that states with lower per capita incomes, more non-Whites, and more abortion providers had higher abortion rates. This study is important because it is the first to use an SCM analysis to examine the effects of any type of restrictive abortion law on the demand for abortions.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 215
页数:10
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Abadie A(2003)The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country The American Economic Review 93 113-132
[2]  
Gardeazabal J(2010)Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: Estimating the effect of California’s tobacco control program Journal of the American Statistical Association 105 493-505
[3]  
Abadie A(2011)Synth: An R package for synthetic control methods in comparative case studies Journal of Statistical Software 42 1-17
[4]  
Diamond A(2004)National laws and unsafe abortion: The parameters of change Reproductive Health Matters 12 1-8
[5]  
Hainmueller J(2001)The effect of abortion restrictions on the timing of abortions Journal of Health Economics 20 1011-1032
[6]  
Abadie A(1996)The impact of provider availability on abortion demand Contemporary Economic Policy 14 95-106
[7]  
Diamond A(2001)Provider availability, race, and abortion demand Southern Economic Journal 67 656-671
[8]  
Hainmueller J(2008)Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors The Review of Economics and Statistics 90 414-427
[9]  
Berger M(1997)Mandatory parental involvement in Minor’s abortions: Effects of the Laws in Minnesota, Missouri, and Indiana American Journal of Public Health 87 1367-1374
[10]  
Bitler M(1990)Abortion demand Population Research and Policy Review 9 151-160