Efficacy of polyvalent vaccine on immune response and disease resistance against streptococcosis/lactococcosis and yersiniosis in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

被引:0
作者
Ahmad Erfanmanesh
Babak Beikzadeh
Majid Khanzadeh
机构
[1] Tehran Organization,Animal Biological Product Research Group, Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR)
[2] University of Isfahan,Department of Cell and Molecular Biology & Microbiology, Faculty of Biological Sciences and Technology
[3] Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources,Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences
来源
Veterinary Research Communications | 2023年 / 47卷
关键词
Immune parameters; Rainbow trout; Streptococcosis/Lactococcosis; Vaccine; Yersiniosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Diseases are the most significant challenge in the development and stability of aquaculture. In this study, the immunogenic efficiency of polyvalent streptococcosis/lactococcosis and yersiniosis vaccines was evaluated by injection and immersion methods in rainbow trout.. The 450 fish with an average weight of 50 ± 5 g were divided into three treatments and three replications as follows: injection vaccine treatment, immersion vaccine treatment and control group without vaccine administration. Fish were kept for 74 days and sampling was done on days 20, 40 and 60. Then, from the 60th to the 74th day, the immunized groups were challenged with three bacteria Streptococcus iniae (S. iniae), Lactococcus garvieae (L. garvieae) and Yersinia ruckeri (Y. ruckeri) separately. A significant difference was observed in the weight gained (WG) in the immunized groups compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The relative survival percentage (RPS) after 14 days of challenge with S. iniae, L. garvieae and Y. ruckeri in the injection group compared to the control group increased respectively (60%, 60% and 70%), (P < 0.05). Also, RPS in the immersion group had an increase respectively (30%, 40% and 50%) after the challenge with S. iniae, L.garvieae and Y. ruckeri compared to the control group. Immune indicators such as antibody titer, complement and lysozyme activity significantly increased in comparison to the control group (P < 0.05). In general, it can be concluded that applying three vaccines by injection and immersion method has significant effects on immune protection and survival rate. However, the injection method is more effective and more suitable than the immersion method.
引用
收藏
页码:1347 / 1355
页数:8
相关论文
共 195 条
[1]  
Barnes AC(2022)Autogenous vaccination in aquaculture: a locally enabled solution towards reduction of the global antimicrobial resistance problem Rev Aquac 14 907-918
[2]  
Silayeva O(2000)Antibiotic use in animal feed and its impact on human healt Nut Res Reviews 13 279-299
[3]  
Landos M(2012)Effectiveness of bivalent vaccines against Fish Shellfish Immunol 32 756-761
[4]  
Dong HT(2018) and Biology 7 24-5
[5]  
Lusiastuti A(2015) infections in rainbow trout Aquac 440 1-315
[6]  
Phuoc LH(2018) (Walbaum) Fish Shellfish Immunol 75 308-183
[7]  
Delamare-Deboutteville J(1997)Applications of microalgal biotechnology for disease control in aquaculture Vet Immunol Immunopathol 56 175-127
[8]  
Barton MD(1999)Booster immersion vaccination using diluted Dis Aquat Org 36 121-97
[9]  
Bastardo A(2019) bacterin confers protection against ERM in rainbow trout Dis Aquat Org 134 89-105
[10]  
Ravelo C(2004)Six genes of ompA family shuffling for development of polyvalent vaccines against Fish Shellfish Immunol 16 93-58