Genetic and epigenetic variation in mass selection populations of Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas

被引:0
作者
Qun Jiang
Qi Li
Hong Yu
Ling-Feng Kong
机构
[1] Ocean University of China,Key Laboratory of Mariculture Ministry of Education
来源
Genes & Genomics | 2013年 / 35卷
关键词
Pacific oyster; Genetic variation; Epigenetic variation; AFLP; MSAP;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Selective breeding often produces an improvement in phenotype. Much of the phenotypic change within a species is a consequence of genetic variation. However, there is growing evidence for phenotypic change even in the absence of DNA sequence polymorphisms, termed epigenetic variation. This study’s goal was to investigate the genetic and epigenetic variation in the mass selection populations of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas), determine if any correlation exists between the genetic and epigenetic variations. This can serve as a first step in investigating the potential role epigenetic variations have in selective breeding. Amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis and methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism methodology were used to monitor genetic and epigenetic variation in two populations (the base stock and the third selected generation) from a mass selection line in the Pacific oyster. The correlation between genetic and epigenetic variation was evaluated by Co-Inertia Analysis. The genetic difference was mainly found in the gene frequency shift revealed by the FST value (0.0151, P < 0.01) and no significant reduction in genetic diversity was detected. The percentage of methylation in C. gigas was 26.4 %. No significant difference was observed on the average state of methylation, but a few bands showed different frequencies between the two populations. Co-Inertia Analysis revealed a significant association between the genetic and epigenetic profiles (P < 0.01).
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 647
页数:6
相关论文
共 176 条
[1]  
Ainouche M(2009)Hybridization, polyploidy and invasion: lessons from Biol Invasions 11 1159-1173
[2]  
Fortune P(2010) (Poaceae) Mol Ecol 19 1283-1295
[3]  
Salmon A(2006)Environmentally induced phenotypes and DNA methylation: how to deal with unpredictable conditions until the next generation and after Aquaculture 254 148-159
[4]  
Parisod C(1999)Genetic diversity and effective population size in mass selection lines of Pacific oyster ( Aquac Res 30 373-378
[5]  
Grandbastien MA(1997)) J Shellfish Res 16 55-58
[6]  
Fukunaga K(2010)Test of size-specific mass selection for Nile tilapia, Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67 217-224
[7]  
Ricou M(2002) L., cage farming in the Philippines Mol Genet Genomics 268 543-552
[8]  
Misset MT(1999)Genetic divergence and loss of diversity in two cultured populations of the bay scallop, Nature 401 157-161
[9]  
Angers B(1987) (Lamarck 1819) Aquaculture 60 99-105
[10]  
Castonguay E(1994)No evidence for large differences in genomic methylation between wild and hatchery steelhead ( Fresh water Biol 31 277-294