Double-Loop Learning in Adaptive Management: The Need, the Challenge, and the Opportunity

被引:0
作者
Byron K. Williams
Eleanor D. Brown
机构
[1] The Wildlife Society,Science and Decisions Center
[2] U.S. Geological Survey,Science and Decisions Center
[3] U.S. Geological Survey,undefined
来源
Environmental Management | 2018年 / 62卷
关键词
Adaptive management; Decision elements; Double-loop learning; Technical and institutional learning; Uncertainty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Adaptive management addresses uncertainty about the processes influencing resource dynamics, as well as the elements of decision making itself. The use of management to reduce both kinds of uncertainty is known as double-loop learning. Though much work has been done on the theory and procedures to address structural uncertainty, there has been less progress in developing an explicit approach for institutional learning about decision elements. Our objective is to describe evidence-based learning about the decision elements, as a complement to the formal “learning by doing” framework for reducing structural uncertainties. Adaptive management is described as a multi-phase approach to management and learning, with a set-up phase of identifying stakeholders, objectives, and other decision elements; an iterative phase that uses these elements in an ongoing cycle of technical learning about system structure and management impacts; and an institutional learning phase involving the periodic reconsideration of the decision elements. We describe a framework for institutional learning that is complementary to that of technical learning, including uncertainty metrics, propagation of change, and mechanisms and consequences of change over time. Operational issues include ways to recognize when the decision elements should be revisited, which elements should be adjusted, and how alternatives can be identified and incorporated based on experience and management performance. We discuss the application of this framework in decision making for renewable natural resources. As important as it is to learn about the processes driving resource dynamics, learning about the elements of the decision architecture is equally, if not more, important.
引用
收藏
页码:995 / 1006
页数:11
相关论文
共 197 条
[1]  
Armstrong DP(2007)Using adaptive management to determine requirements of re‐introduced populations: The case of the New Zealand hihi J Appl Ecol 44 953-962
[2]  
Castro I(2009)Developing an adaptive management approach to prescribed burning: A long-term heathland conservation experiment in north-west Italy Intern J Wildland Fire 18 727-735
[3]  
Griffiths R(2017)Integrative governance of environmental water in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin: Evolving challenges and emerging pathways Environ Manag 15 1-6
[4]  
Ascoli D(2009)Adaptive management for mitigating J Environ Manag 90 3122-3134
[5]  
Beghin R(2011) risk in source water: a case study in an agricultural catchment in South Australia Biol Conserv 144 1204-1213
[6]  
Ceccato R(2005)Conservation in the face of climate change: the roles of alternative models, monitoring, and adaptation in confronting and reducing uncertainty J Appl Ecol 42 160-170
[7]  
Gorlier A(2014)Adaptive restoration of sand‐mined areas for biological conservation Ecol Soc 19 1-819
[8]  
Lombardi G(2017)Learning in adaptive management: Insights from published practice Sci Adv 3 807-1119
[9]  
Lonati M(2006)Participatory adaptive management leads to environmental learning outcomes extending beyond the sphere of science Ecol Appl 16 1106-1222
[10]  
Marzano R(2008)Should managed populations be monitored every year? Ecosystems 11 1212-213