Transformational Leadership, Organizational Clan Culture, Organizational Affective Commitment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Case of South Korea's Public Sector

被引:0
作者
Kim H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Public Administration, Chonnam National University at Gwangju, Gwangju
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Affective commitment; Clan culture; Organizational citizenship behavior; Transformational leadership;
D O I
10.1007/s11115-013-0225-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present study examines whether transformational leadership is associated with clan culture, affective commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior and whether affective commitment is positively related to organizational citizenship behavior. The study also examines whether affective commitment mediates the effects of clan culture on organizational citizenship behavior and whether clan culture mediates the effects of transformational leadership on affective commitment. The results of this study indicate a positive relationship between transformational leadership and clan culture as well as between transformational leadership and affective commitment; no significant relationship between clan culture and organizational citizenship behavior as well as between transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior; and a significant positive relationship between affective commitment and organizational citizenship behavior as well as between clan culture and affective commitment. Thus, the results clearly show that affective commitment fully mediates the relationship between clan culture and organizational citizenship behavior and that clan culture partially mediates the relationship between transformational leadership and affective commitment. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings as well as interesting avenues for future research are discussed. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 417
页数:20
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Albrecht S., Leadership climate in the public sector: feelings matter too, International Journal of Public Administration, 28, pp. 397-416, (2005)
[2]  
Allen N.J., Meyer J.P., The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, pp. 1-18, (1990)
[3]  
Allen N.J., Meyer J.P., Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: an examination of construct validity, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, pp. 252-276, (1996)
[4]  
Anderson J.C., Gerbing D.W., Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin, 103, 3, pp. 411-423, (1988)
[5]  
Avolio B.J., Yammarino F.J., Operationalizing charismatic leadership using a levels-of-analysis framework, The Leadership Quarterly, 1, pp. 193-208, (1990)
[6]  
Avolio B.J., Bass B.M., Jung D.J., Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, pp. 441-462, (1999)
[7]  
Avolio B.J., Bass B.M., Walumbwa F.O., Zhu W., MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Technical Report, Leader Form, Rate Form, and Scoring Key for MLQ Form 5x-Short, (2004)
[8]  
Avolio B.J., Zhu W., Koh W., Bhatia P., Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, pp. 951-968, (2004)
[9]  
Babcock M., Strickland O., The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors, Journal of Psychology, 144, pp. 313-326, (2010)
[10]  
Barney J.B., Organizational culture: can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage, Academy of Management Review, 11, pp. 656-665, (1986)