Information scrambling versus quantum revival through the lens of operator entanglement

被引:0
作者
Kanato Goto
Ali Mollabashi
Masahiro Nozaki
Kotaro Tamaoka
Mao Tian Tan
机构
[1] RIKEN Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Sciences (iTHEMS),Center for Gravitational Physics, Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics (YITP)
[2] Kyoto University,Kavli Institute for Theoretical Sciences and CAS Center for Excellence in Topological Quantum Computation
[3] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Department of Physics, College of Humanities and Sciences
[4] Nihon University,Center for Quantum Phenomena, Department of Physics
[5] New York University,undefined
来源
Journal of High Energy Physics | / 2022卷
关键词
AdS-CFT Correspondence; Black Holes; Conformal Field Theory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we look for signatures of quantum revivals in two-dimensional conformal field theories (2d CFTs) on a spatially compact manifold by using operator entanglement. It is believed that thermalization does not occur on spatially compact manifolds as the quantum state returns to its initial state which is a phenomenon known as quantum revival. We find that in CFTs such as the free fermion CFT, the operator mutual information exhibits quantum revival in accordance with the relativistic propagation of quasiparticles while in holographic CFTs, the operator mutual information does not exhibit this revival and the quasiparticle picture breaks down. Furthermore, by computing the tripartite operator mutual information, we find that the information scrambling ability of holographic CFTs can be weakened by the finite size effect. We propose a modification of an effective model known as the line tension picture to explain the entanglement dynamics due to the strong scrambling effect and find a close relationship between this model and the wormhole (Einstein-Rosen Bridge) in the holographic bulk dual.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Bocchieri P(1957) 2 Phys. Rev. 107 337-undefined
  • [2] Loinger A(1961) 2 J. Math. Phys. 2 235-undefined
  • [3] Percival IC(1978)undefined Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 2379-undefined
  • [4] Schulman LS(1990)undefined Phys. Rev. A 42 6308-undefined
  • [5] Dačić Gaeta Z(2008)undefined Nature 452 854-undefined
  • [6] Stroud CR(2018)undefined Nature Phys. 14 745-undefined
  • [7] Rigol M(2021)undefined Nature Phys. 17 675-undefined
  • [8] Dunjko V(2007)undefined J. Stat. Mech. 0710 P10004-undefined
  • [9] Olshanii M(2014)undefined J. Stat. Mech. 1412 P12017-undefined
  • [10] Turner CJ(2011)undefined J. Stat. Mech. 1108 P08019-undefined