Genetic causal beliefs about morbidity: associations with health behaviors and health outcome beliefs about behavior changes between 1982–2002 in the Finnish population

被引:0
作者
Ari Haukkala
Hanna Konttinen
Nelli Hankonen
Markus Perola
Helena Kääriäinen
Veikko Salomaa
机构
[1] University of Helsinki,Department of Social Research
[2] University of Tampere,School of Social Sciences and Humanities
[3] National Institute for Health and Welfare,undefined
来源
BMC Public Health | / 15卷
关键词
Genetics; Causal beliefs; Health behaviors; Attitudes; Behavior change; Obesity; Smoking; Physical activity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [1] French DP(2001)Causal attributions for heart disease: a systematic review Psychol Health 16 77-98
  • [2] Senior V(2004)Deriving lay models of uncertainty about genes’ role in illness causation to guide communication about human genetics J Commun 54 105-22
  • [3] Weinman J(2011)Genetic essentialism: on the deceptive determinism of DNA Psychol Bull 137 800-18
  • [4] Marteau TM(2010)Public attitudes and beliefs about genetics Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 11 339-59
  • [5] Parrott R(2010)Causal beliefs about obesity and associated health behaviors: Results from a population-based survey Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7 19-37
  • [6] Silk K(2010)Preferences for genetic and behavioral health information: the impact of risk factors and disease attributions Ann Behav Med 40 127-7
  • [7] Weiner J(2011)Impact of communicating personalized genetic risk information on perceived control over the risk: a systematic review Genet Med 13 273-60
  • [8] Condit C(1999)Will genetic testing for predisposition for disease result in fatalism? a qualitative study of parents responses to neonatal screening for familial hypercholesterolaemia Soc Sci Med 48 1857-8
  • [9] Harris T(2006)Self-regulation and the behavioural response to DNA risk information: a theoretical analysis and framework for future research Soc Sci Med 62 1360-313
  • [10] Bernhardt J(2012)Why does genetic causal information alter perceived treatment effectiveness? an analogue study Br J Health Psychol 17 294-46