E-Government Use, Perceived Transparency, Public Knowledge of Government Performance, and Satisfaction with Government: An Analysis of Mediating, Moderating, and Framing Mechanisms Based on the COVID-19 Outbreak Control Survey Data from China

被引:0
作者
Edward Gu
Tianguang Meng
Hongying Wang
Alexander Zhang
机构
[1] Zhejiang University,School of Public Affairs, Academy of Social Governance, and Center of Social Welfare and Governance
[2] Tsinghua University,Department of Political Science
[3] University of Waterloo,Department of Political Science
[4] University of Pittsburgh,Department of Political Science
来源
Social Indicators Research | 2023年 / 169卷
关键词
E-government; Satisfaction with the government; Government transparency; Mediation; Framing effect; Moderation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
According to the existing literature on public management, many factors affect popular satisfaction with the government (referred to as “government satisfaction”), one of which is the use of e-government. Particularly, many e-government proponents regard increasing government transparency as an important way to improve government satisfaction. To test the validity of this assertion, this paper uses an Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression model to analyze survey data on individuals’ e-government usage frequencies in China and their satisfaction with the local government during the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that people can rationally and consciously evaluate governments and make decisions by using the government performance information that they know about. This conscious and rational process is also mixed with the impact of some irrational and emotional factors, which is consistent with the concept of the “framing effect.” This paper identifies local government transparency as the mediating variable in the relationship between the use of e-government and government satisfaction and public knowledge of local government performance in COVID-19 outbreak control as the moderating variable in the relationship between local government transparency and government satisfaction. Since the mediating effect of local government transparency is significantly different from those of overall and central government transparency, government transparency at different levels plays a role of the above-mentioned “frame.”
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 124
页数:45
相关论文
共 181 条
  • [1] Albrecht F(2017)Government accountability and natural disasters: The impact of natural hazard events on political trust and satisfaction with governments in Europe Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 8 381-410
  • [2] Arceneaux K(2006)Who is held responsible when disaster strikes? The attribution of responsibility for a natural disaster in an urban election Journal of Urban Affairs 28 43-53
  • [3] Stein RM(2020)Can government’s presence on social media stimulate citizens’ online political participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness Government Information Quarterly 37 101486-394
  • [4] Arshad S(2009)A review of the implications of prospect theory for natural hazards and disaster planning International Journal of Environmental Research 3 379-308
  • [5] Khurram S(2009)What is transparency? Public Integrity 11 293-21
  • [6] Asgari A(2018)The mediating effect of transparency in the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate reputation Revista Brasileira De Gestão De Negócios 20 5-1182
  • [7] Levy J(1986)The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 1173-83
  • [8] Ball C(1957)A generalized classical method of linear estimation of coefficients in a structural equation Econometrica 25 77-868
  • [9] Baraibar-Diez E(2011)How lasting is voter gratitude? An analysis of the short-and long-term electoral returns to beneficial policy American Journal of Political Science 55 852-2464
  • [10] Sotorrío LL(1999)Coping self-efficacy as a mediator of distress following a natural disaster Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29 2443-218