Operationalising “Double-Loop” Learning in Service Organisations: A Systems Approach for Creating Knowledge

被引:0
作者
Ayham A. M. Jaaron
Chris J. Backhouse
机构
[1] An-Najah National University,Industrial Engineering Department
[2] Loughborough University,Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering
来源
Systemic Practice and Action Research | 2017年 / 30卷
关键词
“Double-loop” learning; Learning organisation; The Vanguard method; Systems thinking; Service operations; Operations management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Learning organisation literature has widely discussed the connections between “double-loop” learning and its significance to organisational performance, but paying little attention to tools and systems that can operationalise “double-loop” learning in organisations. This paper investigates the impact of applying a systems approach for service operations design, expressed as the Vanguard Method (Seddon, Freedom from command and control: a better way to make the work work, 2003), in order to activate “double-loop” learning in service organisations. Two case studies were conducted in the banking mortgage operations and adults’ social care services in the UK, using the dimensions of the learning organisation questionnaire (DLOQ), semi-structured interviews, observations, and documents. The findings of the cross-case analysis support the link of applying the Vanguard Method with operationalising “double-loop” learning through three main factors, namely systematic-operations improvement, organisational capacity development, and outside-in mode of work; that are all embedded into the seven dimensions of the DLOQ. The value of this paper is the introduction of a service operations design tool that can activate “double-loop” learning performance in the fast changing knowledge era. It also provides an impetus for service organisations to creatively influence employees’ competencies to effectively improve internal systems.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 337
页数:20
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [21] Gregory AJ(2012)Transforming public organizations into learning organizations: a conceptual model Public Organ Rev 12 71-84
  • [22] Hannah ST(1998)Building operations management theory through case and field research J Oper Manag 16 441-454
  • [23] Lester PB(2004)A study to improve organizational performance: a view from SHRM J Am Acad Bus 4 289-291
  • [24] Ilgen DR(1995)Understanding organizations as learning systems Sloan Manag Rev 36 73-86
  • [25] Hollenbeck JR(2004)The learning organization: towards an integrated model Learn Organ 11 129-144
  • [26] Johnson M(2014)Is the learning organization idea relevant to higher educational institutions? A literature review and a “multi-stakeholder contingency approach” Int J Educ Manag 28 173-214
  • [27] Jundt D(2011)Integrating knowledge management into organisational learning Learn Organ 18 203-223
  • [28] Jaaron A(2012)Measuring organisational learning from errors: development and validation of an integrated model and questionnaire Manag Learn 44 511-536
  • [29] Backhouse C(2006)What do we need to know about wisdom? Manag Decis 44 1246-1257
  • [30] Jaaron A(2013)Is there a global model of learning organizations? An empirical, cross-nation study Int J Hum Resour Manag 24 2278-2298