Operationalising “Double-Loop” Learning in Service Organisations: A Systems Approach for Creating Knowledge

被引:0
作者
Ayham A. M. Jaaron
Chris J. Backhouse
机构
[1] An-Najah National University,Industrial Engineering Department
[2] Loughborough University,Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering
来源
Systemic Practice and Action Research | 2017年 / 30卷
关键词
“Double-loop” learning; Learning organisation; The Vanguard method; Systems thinking; Service operations; Operations management;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Learning organisation literature has widely discussed the connections between “double-loop” learning and its significance to organisational performance, but paying little attention to tools and systems that can operationalise “double-loop” learning in organisations. This paper investigates the impact of applying a systems approach for service operations design, expressed as the Vanguard Method (Seddon, Freedom from command and control: a better way to make the work work, 2003), in order to activate “double-loop” learning in service organisations. Two case studies were conducted in the banking mortgage operations and adults’ social care services in the UK, using the dimensions of the learning organisation questionnaire (DLOQ), semi-structured interviews, observations, and documents. The findings of the cross-case analysis support the link of applying the Vanguard Method with operationalising “double-loop” learning through three main factors, namely systematic-operations improvement, organisational capacity development, and outside-in mode of work; that are all embedded into the seven dimensions of the DLOQ. The value of this paper is the introduction of a service operations design tool that can activate “double-loop” learning performance in the fast changing knowledge era. It also provides an impetus for service organisations to creatively influence employees’ competencies to effectively improve internal systems.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 337
页数:20
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Argyris C(1977)Double loop learning in organizations Harv Bus Rev 55 115-125
  • [2] Attride-Stirling J(2001)Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research Qual Res 1 385-405
  • [3] Bagodi V(2013)Double loop learning in the Indian two-wheeler service sector Learn Organ 20 264-278
  • [4] Mahanty B(2012)Leadership style and team processes as predictors of organisational learning Team Perform Manag 18 347-369
  • [5] Bhat AB(2004)Does double loop learning create reliable knowledge? Learn Organ 11 11-27
  • [6] Verma N(1951)Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests Psychometrika 16 297-334
  • [7] Rangnekar S(2013)Learning organization dimensions of the Sri Lanka army Learn Organ 20 195-215
  • [8] Barua MK(2000)Developing learning organisations in the new NHS Br Med J 320 998-1001
  • [9] Blackman D(1993)Building a learning organization Harv Bus Rev 71 78-91
  • [10] Connelly J(2008)Is yours a learning organization? Harv Bus Rev 86 109-116