Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Beyond the Debate

被引:0
作者
Omar Gelo
Diana Braakmann
Gerhard Benetka
机构
[1] Sigmund Freud University—Vienna,Department of Psychotherapeutic Sciences
[2] Sigmund Freud University—Vienna,Department of Psychology
来源
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science | 2008年 / 42卷
关键词
Research methods; Quantitative; Qualitative; Mixed methods research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Psychology has been a highly quantitative field since its conception as a science. However, a qualitative approach to psychological research has gained increasing importance in the last decades, and an enduring debate between quantitative and qualitative approaches has arisen. The recently developed Mixed Methods Research (MMR) addresses this debate by aiming to integrate quantitative and qualitative approaches. This article outlines and discusses quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research approaches with specific reference to their (1) philosophical foundations (i.e. basic sets of beliefs that ground inquiry), (2) methodological assumptions (i.e. principles and formal conditions which guide scientific investigation), and (3) research methods (i.e. concrete procedures for data collection, analysis and interpretation). We conclude that MMR may reasonably overcome the limitation of purely quantitative and purely qualitative approaches at each of these levels, providing a fruitful context for a more comprehensive psychological research.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 290
页数:24
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Cooksy L. J.(2001)The program logic model as an integrative framework for a multimethod evaluation Evaluation and Program Planning 24 119-128
  • [2] Gill P.(1985)The methodological imperative in psychology Philosophy of the Social Sciences 15 1-13
  • [3] Kelly P. A.(2000)Analysis and treatment of finger sucking Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 33 41-52
  • [4] Danziger K.(2002)A qualitative evaluation of an employee counselling service from the perspective of client, counsellor and organization Counselling Psychology Quarterly 15 201-208
  • [5] Ellingson S. A.(2002)Injury rehabilitation: a goal-setting intervention study Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 73 310-319
  • [6] Miltenberger R. G.(2002)Injury rehabilitation: a qualitative follow-up study Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 73 320-329
  • [7] Stricker J. M.(1993)Single-case methodology in psychotherapy process and outcome research Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61 373-380
  • [8] Garlinghouse M. A.(1988)Against the quantitative–qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard Educational Researcher 17 10-16
  • [9] Roberts J.(1995)Sustaining versus resolving the quantitative–qualitative debate Evaluation and Program Planning 18 89-96
  • [10] Rapp J. T.(1998)Nomothetic and idiographic: Contrasting Windelband’s understanding with contemporary usage Theory & Psychology 8 23-38