The Ethical Dimension of Equity Incentives: A Behavioral Agency Examination of Executive Compensation and Pension Funding

被引:0
作者
Geoffrey P. Martin
Robert M. Wiseman
Luis R. Gomez-Mejia
机构
[1] University of Melbourne,Melbourne Business School
[2] Michigan State University,Eli Broad College of Business
[3] Arizona State University,Department of Management, WP Carey School of Business
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2020年 / 166卷
关键词
Ethical decision making; Incentives; Stakeholder agency; Executive compensation; Pension funding; Behavioral agency;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We draw on the behavioral agency model to explore the ethical consequences of CEO equity incentives. We argue that CEOs are more concerned with funding pension plans when they have more to gain from their stock options yet will increasingly underfund employee pension funds as their current option wealth increases. Our findings reveal that both effects hold when the CEO has greater power (also occupying board chair) over firm decision making. Our study suggests that there is an ethical dimension to equity incentives, given they are intended to align CEO interests with shareholders, yet potentially incentivize CEO behaviors with adverse consequences for employees. Insights from our findings provide boards and regulators with behavioral levers to protect employee well-being in the context of pension funding.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 610
页数:15
相关论文
共 212 条
[1]  
Abernethy MA(2015)The influence of CEO power on compensation contract design The Accounting Review 90 1265-1306
[2]  
Kuang YF(2018)CEO pay is indeed decoupled from CEO performance: Charting a path for the future Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management 16 117-136
[3]  
Qin B(2018)The two sides of CEO pay injustice: A power law conceptualization of CEO over and underpayment Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management (Published by Emerald) 16 330-795
[4]  
Aguinis H(1972)Production, information costs, and economic organization The American Economic Review 62 777-357
[5]  
Gomez-Mejia LR(2007)Modelling credit risk for SMEs: Evidence from the US market Abacus 43 332-448
[6]  
Martin GP(1996)Firms’ choice of estimation parameters: Empirical evidence from SFAS No. 106 Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 11 427-351
[7]  
Joo H(2014)Managerial risk taking incentives and corporate pension policy Journal of Financial Economics 111 328-429
[8]  
Aguinis H(2007)Strategic responsiveness and Bowman's risk–return paradox Strategic Management Journal 28 407-88
[9]  
Martin GP(2012)Executive stock options, differential risk-taking incentives, and firm value Journal of Financial Economics 104 70-252
[10]  
Gomez-Mejia LR(2002)What is the central feature of extraversion? Social attention versus reward sensitivity Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 245-74