Can tools help unify organization theory? Perspectives on the state of computational modeling

被引:15
作者
Ashworth M.J. [1 ]
Carley K.M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 5000 Forbes Avenue
[2] Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 5000 Forbes Avenue
来源
Comput. Math. Organ. Theory | 2007年 / 1卷 / 89-111期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Agent-based simulation; Computational organizational theory; Dynamic network analysis; Organizational behavior;
D O I
10.1007/s10588-006-9000-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Scholars engaged in the study of work group and organizational behavior are increasingly calling for the use of integrated methods in conducting research, including the wider adoption of computational models for generating and testing new theory. Our review of the state of modern computational modeling incorporating social structures reveals steady increases in the incorporation of dynamic, adaptive, and realistic behaviors of agents in network settings, yet exposes gaps that must be addressed in the next generation of organizational simulation systems. We compare 28 models according to more than two hundred evaluation criteria, ranging from simple representations of agent demographic and performance characteristics, to more richly defined instantiations of behavioral attributes, interaction with non-agent entities, model flexibility, communication channels, simulation types, knowledge, transactive memory, task complexity, and resource networks. Our survey assesses trends across the wide set of criteria, discusses practical applications, and proposes an agenda for future research and development. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 111
页数:22
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Aldrich H., Incommensurable paradigms? Vital Signs from Three Perspectives, Rethinking Organization: New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis, pp. 17-45, (1992)
[2]  
Argyris C., Schon D., Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, (1978)
[3]  
Ashworth M., Work Team Effectiveness Field Research: Progress and prospects, 65th Academy of Management Conference, (2005)
[4]  
Baligh H., Burton R., Obel B., Devising Expert Systems in Organization Theory: The Organizational Consultant, Organization Management and Expert Systems, pp. 35-57, (1990)
[5]  
Baligh H., Burton R., Obel B., Validating the Organizational Consultant on the Fly, Computational Organization Theory, pp. 179-194, (1994)
[6]  
Bloomfield L., Moulton A., Managing International Conflict: From Theory to Policy, (1997)
[7]  
Carley K., Group stability: A Socio-Cognitive Approach, Advances in Group Processes: Theory and Research, 7, pp. 1-44, (1990)
[8]  
Carley K., Trading Information Redundancy for Task Simplicity, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 261-270, (1990)
[9]  
Carley K., A Theory of Group Stability, Amer Sociol Rev, 56, 3, pp. 331-354, (1991)
[10]  
Carley K., Designing Organizational Structures to Cope with Communication Breakdowns: A Simulation Model, Industr Cris Quart, 5, pp. 19-57, (1991)