Derivation of various NONMEM estimation methods

被引:0
|
作者
Yaning Wang
机构
[1] Office of Clinical Pharmacology,Food and Drug Administration
[2] CDER,undefined
关键词
Nonlinear mixed-effects; Likelihood approximation; Laplacian; First-order conditional method (FOCE); First-order method (FO);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Various estimation methods and the lack of a systematic derivation of the core objective function implemented in NONMEM for nonlinear mixed effect modeling has caused consistent confusion and inquiry among scientists who routinely use NONMEM for data analysis. This paper provides a detailed derivation of the objective functions for the most commonly used estimation methods in NONMEM, such as the Laplacian method, the first-order conditional estimation method (FOCE) with or without interaction, and the first-order method (FO). In addition, models with homogenous or heterogeneous residual error were used to demonstrate the relationship between the objective functions derived from two different types of approximation, namely Laplacian approximation of log-likelihood and linearized model approximation. The relationship between these estimation methods and those implemented in SAS and Splus is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 593
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Derivation of various NONMEM estimation methods
    Wang, Yaning
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2007, 34 (05) : 575 - 593
  • [2] Derivation of various NONMEM estimation methods
    Yaning Wang
    Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2008, 35 : 249 - 249
  • [3] Derivation of various NONMEM estimation methods (vol 34, pg 575, 2007)
    Wang, Yaning
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2008, 35 (02) : 249 - 249
  • [4] NONMEM Tutorial Part II: Estimation Methods and Advanced Examples
    Bauer, Robert J.
    CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 8 (08): : 538 - 556
  • [5] Bayesian estimation in NONMEM
    Johnston, Curtis K.
    Waterhouse, Timothy
    Wiens, Matthew
    Mondick, John
    French, Jonathan
    Gillespie, William R.
    CPT-PHARMACOMETRICS & SYSTEMS PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 13 (02): : 192 - 207
  • [6] Evaluation of bias, precision, robustness and runtime for estimation methods in NONMEM 7
    Åsa M. Johansson
    Sebastian Ueckert
    Elodie L. Plan
    Andrew C. Hooker
    Mats O. Karlsson
    Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2014, 41 : 223 - 238
  • [7] Accuracy and precision of different NONMEM-V estimation methods.
    Lalonde, RL
    Periclou, A
    Ouellet, D
    Lavigne, J
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 63 (02) : 201 - 201
  • [8] Evaluation of bias, precision, robustness and runtime for estimation methods in NONMEM 7
    Johansson, Asa M.
    Ueckert, Sebastian
    Plan, Elodie L.
    Hooker, Andrew C.
    Karlsson, Mats O.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2014, 41 (03) : 223 - 238
  • [9] Bayesian Methods - A Comparison of Stan, NONMEM NUTS, and NONMEM BAYES
    Davis, Casey
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2018, 45 : S131 - S131
  • [10] Evaluation of the nonparametric estimation method in NONMEM VI
    Savic, Radojka M.
    Kjellsson, Maria C.
    Karlsson, Mats O.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 37 (01) : 27 - 35