Comprehensive Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Fused Filament Fabrication Products Produced Under Various Performance Requirements

被引：11

作者：

Ma H. ^{[1
,2
]}

Zhang Y. ^{[3
,4
]}

Jiao Z. ^{[1
,2
]}

Yang W. ^{[1
,2
]}

He X. ^{[1
,2
]}

Xie G. ^{[3
,4
]}

Li H. ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing

[2] State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing

[3] College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing

[4] National Energy R&D Center for Biomass, China Agricultural University, Beijing

来源：

Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series C | 2021年 / 102卷 / 01期

关键词：

3D printing; Environmental impact; Fused filament fabrication; Life cycle assessment;

D O I：

10.1007/s40032-020-00637-9

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the most commonly used 3D printing technologies and has gradually become an important plastic processing technology. However, due to the variety of performance and application scenarios of FFF products, there is no research to comprehensively evaluate the environmental impact of the process. The environmental impact assessment method of FFF products under different performance requirements was proposed innovatively. Through the assessment, we found that the life cycle environmental impact of FFF products produced under various performance requirements can be up to several times different from each other and the FFF process can best reflect its environmentally friendly characteristics when manufacturing products do not require high strength and high surface quality. This paper aims to propose the rational application scenario and the positive solutions to reduce environmental impact for FFF, meanwhile provide future directions for the sustainable development of the FFF technology. © 2020, The Institution of Engineers (India).

引用

页码：59 / 73

页数：14

共 34 条

[1]

Mulder K.F., Sustainable consumption and production of plastics, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 58, 1, pp. 105-124, (1998)

[2]

Kuhlke W.C., The changing face of the plastics industry, Plast. Eng., 54, 8, pp. 73-75, (1998)

[3]

Dudek P., FDM 3D printing technology in manufacturing composite elements, Arch. Metall. Mater., 58, 4, pp. 1415-1418, (2013)

[4]

Yang Y., Li L., Evaluation of environmental sustainability for additive manufacturing batch production, International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference Collocated with the JSME/ASME 2017, (2017)

[5]

Luo Y.C., Ji Z.M., Leu M.C., Caudill R.J., Environmental performance analysis of solid freedom fabrication processes, IEEE International Symposium on Electronics & the Environment, pp. 1-6, (1997)

[6]

Meteyer S., Xu X., Perry N., Zhao Y.F., Energy and material flow analysis of binder-jetting additive manufacturing processes, Procedia Cirp., 15, pp. 19-25, (2014)

[7]

Griffiths C.A., Howarth J., Almeida-Rowbotham G.D., Rees A., Kerton R.M., A design of experiments approach for the optimisation of energy and waste during the production of parts manufactured by 3D printing, J. Clean. Prod., 139, pp. 74-85, (2016)

[8]

Cerdas F., Juraschek M., Thiede S., Herrmann C., Life cycle assessment of 3D printed products in a distributed manufacturing system, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 1, pp. S80-S91, (2017)

[9]

Kreiger M., Pearce J.M., Environmental life cycle analysis of distributed three-dimensional printing and conventional manufacturing of polymer products, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 1, 12, pp. 1511-1519, (2013)

[10]

Kafara M., Suchting M., Kemnitzer J., Westermann H.H., Steinhilper R., Comparative life cycle assessment of conventional and additive manufacturing in mold core making for CFRP production, Procedia Manuf., 8, pp. 223-230, (2017)

← 1 2 3 4 →