The Reciprocal Relationship Between Technology and Psychology

被引：3
作者：
Terry L. [1 ]
Mishra P. [1 ]
Henriksen D. [1 ]
Wolf L.G. [1 ]
Kereluik K. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Educational Psychology and Educational Technology Program, College of Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing
来源：
TechTrends | 2013年 / 57卷 / 3期
关键词：
Design; Development; Learning Theories; Repurposing; Technology;
D O I：
10.1007/s11528-013-0660-2
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This article describes the design and implementation of the year 2 curriculum and student learning experiences in the Michigan State University Master of Arts in Educational Technology program. We discuss the ways that this second set of courses builds on the first year of the program that students encounter, and also describe the theoretical impetus and design-based implications for learning how to teach with technology in effective and creative ways. Students in this group usually come in with some prior knowledge of educational theory, as well as some experience of working with classroom technologies. We intentionally build upon this prior knowledge, to take it to the next level of a more sophisticated TPACK-oriented understanding of learning in technology-driven contexts. Our year 2 courses move classical educational psychology theories of learning, along with educational research issues, squarely into the modern context of educational technology and teacher leadership. Our curriculum design focuses centrally on making meaningful experiences for teachers around technology, and helping them develop the knowledge and skills to create such experiences for their students. Our goal is to develop teachers who see themselves as flexible designers of learning experiences through the creative re-purposing of existing technologies. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码：34 / 39
页数：5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Bruce B.C., Technology in social practice: Returning to Dewey's conception of learning, Toward human-centered systems for solving national challenge problems: NSF/ARL/BI (NAB) workshop, pp. 16-20, (1997)
  • [2] Dewey J., How We Think, (1910)
  • [3] Dewey J., Art as Experience, (1934)
  • [4] Kereluik K., Mishra P., Koehler M.J., On learning to subvert signs: Literacy, technology and the TPACK framework, The California Reader, 44, 2, pp. 12-18, (2010)
  • [5] Koehler M.J., Mishra P., Bouck E.C., De-Schryver M., Kereluik K., Shin T.S., Wolf L.G., Deep-Play: Developing TPACK for 21st Century Teachers, International Journal of Learning Technology, 6, 2, pp. 146-163, (2011)
  • [6] Koehler M.J., Shin T.S., Mishra P., How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways, Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact: A Research Handbook on Frameworks and Approaches, pp. 16-31, (2011)
  • [7] Mishra P., Koehler M.J., Too cool for school? No way! Using the TPACK framework: You can have your hot tools and teach with them, too, Learning & Leading with Technology, 36, 7, pp. 14-18, (2009)
  • [8] Mishra P., Koehler M., Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge, Teachers College Record, 108, 6, pp. 1017-1054, (2006)
  • [9] Mishra P., Koehler M., Introducing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Paper presented at the American Educational Association Research Conference, (2008)
  • [10] Mishra P., Koehler M.J., Kereluik K., The song remains the same: Looking Back to the Future of Educational Technology, TechTrends, 53, 5, pp. 48-53, (2009)
12