Transrectal periprostatic lidocaine injection anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective study

被引:0
作者
H Ozveri
I Cevik
O Dillioglugil
A Akdaş
机构
[1] URO-TIP Health Services,Department of Urology
[2] Kocaeli University School of Medicine,undefined
来源
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases | 2003年 / 6卷
关键词
biopsy; pain; lidocaine;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy remains the mainstay of the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Although this diagnostic method is a safe procedure and well tolerated by most patients a significant number of patients report discomfort and pain during prostate biopsy. In order to define the best method of anesthesia, many studies, in which different methods were compared, have been performed. To determine the effectiveness of local injection anesthesia in TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, we designed and performed this prospective study in order to evaluate the utility of periprostatic nerve block for pain management. A total of 100 patients who had elevated total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) were included in this study. Half of the patients received periprostatic injection anesthesia (group I) and the remaining half received placebo (group II). Patients received 10 cm3 (5 cm3 each side) 1% lidocaine injected into the periprostatic nerve plexus under transrectal ultrasonic guidance. Pain during biopsy was assessed using a 10-point modified visual analog scale (VAS). In groups I and II, mean patient age was 66.8+2.5 and 65.6+11.5 y, mean tPSA was 7.87±3.6 and 11.3±1.7 ng/ml, mean biopsy duration was 6.5±2.5 and 6.6±2.2 min and mean pain score during TRUS-guided biopsy was 1.46±2.2 and 4.5±2.1, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed with respect to age, tPSA and mean biopsy duration between these groups. Mean pain VAS score was statistically or significantly better (P=0.0001) in the lidocaine injection group (group I), and furthermore no patient had a VAS pain score ≥5 in this group. Only minor and transient complications occurred in both groups. This study reinforces the usage of periprostatic nerve block as a standard method of pain management during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, because it is simple, safe, uncostly and significantly effective without requiring additional time.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 314
页数:3
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Hodge KK(1989)Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate J Urol 142 71-463
[2]  
Collins GN(1993)Multiple transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsies: true morbidity and patient acceptance Br J Urol 71 460-126
[3]  
Lloyd SN(1993)Side effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate Clin Radiol 47 125-173
[4]  
Hehir M(2000)Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy J Urol 163 172-565
[5]  
Me Kelvie GB(2002)Local anesthesia for prostate biopsy by periprostatic lidocaine injection: a double-blind placebo controlled study J Urol 167 563-220
[6]  
Clements R(2002)Lack of effect of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: a randomized prospective study Eur Urol 42 217-399
[7]  
Aideyan OU(2000)A randomized prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: The Emory University experience J Urol 164 397-830
[8]  
Griffiths GJ(1996)Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate J Urol 155 607-1009
[9]  
Peeling WB(2001)Increased patient satisfaction from transrectal ultrasonography and biopsy under sedation BJU Int 87 827-1345
[10]  
Soloway MS(1997)Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate Br J Urol 79 608-860