“Air Cap System” (Luftkappensystem)Decision of the Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) 13 October 2015 – Case No. X ZR 74/14

被引：0

作者：

机构：

来源：

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law | 2016年 / 47卷 / 7期

关键词：

Patent specification; Semantic content of a patent claim; Measures differing in degree; Linguistic, logical-scientific and technical interpretation; Prevelance of technical meaning;

D O I：

10.1007/s40319-016-0516-3

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

If, in a patent specification, two measures that differ only in degree (here: blocking and restriction of an air flow) are named without detailed differentiation as the starting point for a problem arising in the state of the art, then it cannot without further justification be concluded from the fact that only the measure with the stronger effect (here: blocking) is mentioned in the patent claim that the measure with weaker effect is not sufficient to embody the protected teaching.

引用

页码：843 / 847

页数：4