Peer-to-peer sharing and collaborative consumption platforms: a taxonomy and a reproducible analysis

被引:0
作者
Friedrich Chasin
Moritz von Hoffen
Marcus Cramer
Martin Matzner
机构
[1] University of Muenster,European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS)
[2] Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg,undefined
来源
Information Systems and e-Business Management | 2018年 / 16卷
关键词
Taxonomy; Sharing Economy; Collaborative Consumption; P2P; Peer-to-Peer; Platforms; Reproducible research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Airbnb and Uber enable private individuals to share physical resources via their Internet platforms, and both have become popular subjects of information systems and e-business research. In the top dogs’ slipstream resides a variety of less-known platforms that allow to share different resources or to share resources in different ways. Researchers who study these platforms and the underlying consumer behaviors face the problem of situating their findings precisely. Practitioners lack an overview of the diversity of these platforms and their characteristics too. This article suggests a taxonomy that helps to better characterize platforms for Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Sharing and Collaborative Consumption (SCC). We used the taxonomy to describe the evolution of 522 P2P SCC platforms over the period of 35 months and to demonstrate and partly evaluate its application. All descriptions taken together constitute a comprehensive data source to study P2P SCC platforms. When researchers use the taxonomy, they can describe and situate insights precisely so that stakeholders can access them more easily. Furthermore, researchers and practitioners can use our database as well as the analyses we made based on the data for their purpose. Because we deliver the computer scripts that we used in our analysis, our study can easily be reproduced in the future to investigate the dynamics of the P2P SCC market.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 325
页数:32
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Albinsson PA(2012)Alternative marketplaces in the 21st century: building community through sharing events J Consum Behav 11 303-315
[2]  
Yasanthi Perera B(1994)Numerical taxonomy and cluster analysis Typol Taxon 34 24-898
[3]  
Bailey K(2012)Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing J Consum Res 39 881-140
[4]  
Bardhi F(2007)Why not share rather than own? Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 611 126-734
[5]  
Eckhardt GM(2010)Sharing J Consum Res 36 715-23
[6]  
Belk R(2014)Sharing versus pseudo-sharing in web 2.0 Anthropologist 18 7-1600
[7]  
Belk R(2014)You are what you can access: sharing and collaborative consumption online J Bus Res 67 1595-28
[8]  
Belk R(2003)Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production J Mark 67 14-358
[9]  
Belk R(2004)Sharing nicely: on shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production Yale Law J 114 273-282
[10]  
Bendapudi N(2007)The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom Inf Econ Policy 29 278-19