The effect of disease risk probability and disease type on interest in clinic-based versus direct-to-consumer genetic testing services

被引:0
作者
Kerry Sherman
Laura-Kate Shaw
Katrina Champion
Fernanda Caldeira
Margaret McCaskill
机构
[1] Macquarie University,Centre for Emotional Health
[2] Westmead Hospital,Westmead Breast Cancer Institute
[3] Macquarie University,Department of Psychology
[4] University of NSW,National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre
[5] University of Heidelberg,undefined
来源
Journal of Behavioral Medicine | 2015年 / 38卷
关键词
Direct-to-consumer; Genetic testing; Risk probability; Perceived manageability; Perceived severity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The effect of disease-specific cognitions on interest in clinic-based and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing was assessed. Participants (N = 309) responded to an online hypothetical scenario and received genetic testing-related messages that varied by risk probability (25, 50, 75 %) and disease type (Alzheimer’s disease vs. Type 2 Diabetes). Post-manipulation interest increased for both testing types, but was greater for clinic-based testing. Interest was greater for Type 2 Diabetes than for Alzheimer’s disease, the latter perceived as more severe and likely, and less treatable and preventable. For DTC testing only, participants allocated to the high risk condition (75 %) had greater testing interest than those in the low (25 %) category. DTC testing is perceived as a viable, but less preferred, option compared with clinic-based testing. Particularly when considering DTC genetic testing, there is a need to emphasize subjective disease-related perceptions, including risk probability.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 714
页数:8
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [11] Cameron LD(2002)Limitations of direct-to-consumer advertising for clinical genetic testing Journal of the American Medical Association 288 1762-1767
  • [12] Sherman KA(2000)Hereditary colorectal cancer: Risk assessment and management Clinical Genetics 58 89-97
  • [13] Marteau TM(2005)When the risks are low: The impact of absolute and comparative information on disturbance and understanding in US and UK samples Psychology & Health 20 319-330
  • [14] Brown PM(2011)Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: An assessment of genetic counselors’ knowledge and beliefs Genetics in Medicine 13 325-332
  • [15] Caulfield T(2014)Are there gender differences in service use for mental disorders across countries in the European Union? Results from the EU-World Mental Health survey Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 68 649-656
  • [16] Ries NM(2009)Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: Implications for physician-patient interactions Genetics in Medicine 11 582-587
  • [17] Ray PN(2006)Evaluation of the needs and concerns of partners of women at high risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer Psycho-oncology 15 96-108
  • [18] Shuman C(2000)Anticipating response to predictive genetic testing for Alzheimer’s disease: A survey of first-degree relatives The Gerontologist 40 43-52
  • [19] Wilson B(2013)Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and personal genomics services: A review of recent empirical studies Current Genetic Medicine Reports 1 182-200
  • [20] Edwards KT(2000)Impact of genetic testing on causal models of heart disease and arthritis: An analogue study Psychology & Health 14 1077-1088