The effect of disease risk probability and disease type on interest in clinic-based versus direct-to-consumer genetic testing services

被引:0
作者
Kerry Sherman
Laura-Kate Shaw
Katrina Champion
Fernanda Caldeira
Margaret McCaskill
机构
[1] Macquarie University,Centre for Emotional Health
[2] Westmead Hospital,Westmead Breast Cancer Institute
[3] Macquarie University,Department of Psychology
[4] University of NSW,National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre
[5] University of Heidelberg,undefined
来源
Journal of Behavioral Medicine | 2015年 / 38卷
关键词
Direct-to-consumer; Genetic testing; Risk probability; Perceived manageability; Perceived severity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The effect of disease-specific cognitions on interest in clinic-based and direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing was assessed. Participants (N = 309) responded to an online hypothetical scenario and received genetic testing-related messages that varied by risk probability (25, 50, 75 %) and disease type (Alzheimer’s disease vs. Type 2 Diabetes). Post-manipulation interest increased for both testing types, but was greater for clinic-based testing. Interest was greater for Type 2 Diabetes than for Alzheimer’s disease, the latter perceived as more severe and likely, and less treatable and preventable. For DTC testing only, participants allocated to the high risk condition (75 %) had greater testing interest than those in the low (25 %) category. DTC testing is perceived as a viable, but less preferred, option compared with clinic-based testing. Particularly when considering DTC genetic testing, there is a need to emphasize subjective disease-related perceptions, including risk probability.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 714
页数:8
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Barnoy S(2007)Genetic testing for late-onset diseases: effect of disease controllability, test predictivity, and gender on the decision to take the test Genetic Testing 11 187-192
  • [2] Burt R(2005)Genetic testing for inherited colon cancer Gastroenterology 128 1696-1716
  • [3] Neklason DW(2011)Communication strategies for enhancing understanding of the behavioral implications of genetic and biomarker tests for disease risk: The role of coherence Journal of Behavioral Medicine 35 286-298
  • [4] Cameron LD(2009)Psychosocial aspects of genetic testing Current Opinion in Psychiatry 22 218-223
  • [5] Marteau TM(2009)Impact of genetic risk information and type of disease on perceived risk, anticipated affect, and expected consequences of genetic tests Health Psychology 28 307-316
  • [6] Brown PM(2010)Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Good, bad or benign? Clinical Genetics 77 101-105
  • [7] Klein WM(2014)Bridging the consumer-medical divide: How to regulate direct-to-consumer genetic testing Hastings Center Report 44 17-19
  • [8] Sherman KA(2013)Effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on health behaviour and anxiety: A survey of consumers and potential consumers Journal of Genetic Counseling 22 565-575
  • [9] Cameron LD(2014)Public attitudes toward genetic risk testing and its role in healthcare Personalized Medicine 11 509-522
  • [10] Muller C(2012)Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: Systematic review of the literature on user perspectives European Journal of Human Genetics 20 811-816