Using History and Philosophy of Science to Promote Students’ ArgumentationA Teaching–Learning Sequence Based on the Discovery of Oxygen

被引:0
作者
Pablo Antonio Archila
机构
[1] Université Paris Diderot-Paris 7,LDAR (EA 4344), Physics Department
来源
Science & Education | 2015年 / 24卷
关键词
Science Education; Scientific Communication; Chemistry Teacher; Initial Argumentation; Final Argumentation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article describes the effect of a teaching–learning sequence (TLS) based on the discovery of oxygen in promoting students’ argumentation. It examines the written and oral arguments produced by 63 high school students (24 females and 39 males, 16–17 years old) in France during a complete TLS supervised by the same teacher. The data used in this analysis was derived from students’ written responses, audio and video recordings, and written field notes. The first goal of this investigation was to provide evidence that an approach combining history and philosophy of science and argumentation could increase students’ awareness of the relevance of experimentation and communication to scientific progress. The second goal was to assess the effectiveness of the TLS to engage students in argumentative classroom interactions (such as debates) relating to the discovery of oxygen at the end of the 18th century. The findings show that this historical case can be useful for promoting students’ argumentation and is also appropriate for high school students. Future research should include students of other ages, other historical episodes and experiences in other parts of the world.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1226
页数:25
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Abd-El-Khalick F(2013)Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains Science & Education 22 2087-2107
[2]  
Abelson PH(1980)Scientific communication Science 209 60-62
[3]  
Albe V(2008)Students’ positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue Science & Education 17 805-827
[4]  
Archila PA(2012)La investigación en argumentación y sus implicaciones en la formación inicial de profesores de ciencias Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 9 361-375
[5]  
Archila PA(2013)La Argumentación y sus aportes a la enseñanza bilingüe de las ciencias Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 10 406-423
[6]  
Archila PA(2014)Are science teachers prepared to promote argumentation? A case study with pre-service teachers in Bogotá city Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching 15 1-21
[7]  
Archila PA(2014)La argumentación de profesores de química en formación inicial (práctica profesional docente II): Un estudio de caso en Colombia Enseñanza de las Ciencias 32 705-706
[8]  
Archila PA(2015)Uso de conectores y vocabulario espontaneo en la argumentación escrita: Aportes a la alfabetización científica Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 12 402-418
[9]  
Bader B(2003)Interpretation d'une controverse scientifique: Strategies argumentatives d'adolescentes et d'adolescents quebecois Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 3 231-250
[10]  
Begoray DL(2005)Representing science through historical drama Science & Education 14 457-471