Development speed of sibling embryo positively reflects live birth rate after fresh day 3 embryo transfer

被引:0
作者
Xue Wang
Yaling Xiao
Yuanzheng Zhou
Hanbi Wang
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,Department of Gynaecology Endocrine and Reproductive Centre, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
来源
Scientific Reports | / 13卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The ability of sibling embryos to form blastocysts may reflect the developmental potential of the embryos that were transferred into the uterus. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether the development speed of sibling embryos positively reflects the live birth rate following fresh embryo transfer. We examined 1262 cycles of women who underwent day 3 (D3) cleavage embryo transfer in the Peking Union Medical College Hospital in 2015–2020, who were divided into three groups (D5, D5 + D6, and D6) according to blastocyst formation. The live birth rate in patients with blastocysts that formed on D6 was significantly lower than the other two groups (36.1%, 45.6% and 44.7%, P < 0.05). For women with blastocysts that formed on D6, the live birth rate was higher in those with more good quality blastocysts than poor-quality blastocysts (42.4 vs 32.3%, P < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis showed that the blastocyst development speed of sibling embryos was an independent factor affecting live birth after fresh embryo transfer (P < 0.05). We concluded that the blastocyst development speed of sibling embryos may reflect live birth rate following the transfer of D3 cleavage embryos.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Bourdon M(2019)Day 5 versus Day 6 blastocyst transfers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes Hum. Reprod. 34 1948-1964
[2]  
Huang TT(2019)Early blastocyst expansion in euploid and aneuploid human embryos: Evidence for a non-invasive and quantitative marker for embryo selection Reprod. Biomed. Online 39 27-39
[3]  
Huang DH(2021)Clinical pregnancy is significantly associated with the blastocyst width and area: A time-lapse study J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 38 847-855
[4]  
Ahn HJ(2017)Metabolomics as a tool to identify biomarkers to predict and improve outcomes in reproductive medicine: A systematic review Hum. Reprod. Update 23 723-736
[5]  
Arnett C(2020)Impact of embryo quality and endometrial thickness on implantation in natural cycle IVF Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 301 1325-1330
[6]  
Huang CT(2021)Comparison of single euploid blastocyst transfer cycle outcome derived from embryos with normal or abnormal cleavage patterns Reprod. Biomed. Online 42 892-900
[7]  
Sciorio R(2015)Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 32 177-184
[8]  
Thong D(2013)Sibling embryo blastocyst development as a prognostic factor for the outcome of day-3 embryo transfer Reprod. Biomed. Online 26 486-490
[9]  
Thong KJ(2012)Is cryopreservation of embryos a legitimate surrogate marker of embryo quality in studies of assisted reproductive technology conducted using national databases? Fertil. Steril. 97 890-893
[10]  
Pickering SJ(1992)Culture of human spare preembryos: association between blastocyst formation and pregnancy J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 9 41-44