Individualized coronary calcium scoring at any tube voltage using a kV-independent reconstruction algorithm

[11] Janowitz WR(2013)Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7 32-38

[12] Hildner FJ(2018)High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction Eur Radiol 28 3097-3104

[13] Zusmer NR(2017)Accuracy and radiation dose reduction using low-voltage computed tomography coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration Am J Cardiol 119 675-680

[14] Viamonte M(2019)Half-dose coronary artery calcium scoring: impact of iterative reconstruction J Thorac Imaging 34 18-25

[15] Detrano R(2018)The impact of dose reduction on the quantification of coronary artery calcifications and risk categorization: a systematic review J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 12 352-363

[16] Voros S(2014)SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 8 342-358

[17] Rivera JJ(2018)Cardiac-specific conversion factors to estimate radiation effective dose from dose-length product in computed tomography JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11 64-74

[18] Berman DS(2019)Reduced radiation dose with model based iterative reconstruction coronary artery calcium scoring Eur J Radiol 111 1-5

[19] Patel AA(2014)Low-vs. standard-dose coronary artery calcium scanning Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16 358-363

[20] Fine J(2012)Low radiation coronary calcium scoring by dual-source CT with tube current optimization based on patient body size J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6 113-120

[11] Janowitz WR(2013)Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7 32-38

[12] Hildner FJ(2018)High-pitch low-voltage CT coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration: accuracy and radiation dose reduction Eur Radiol 28 3097-3104

[13] Zusmer NR(2017)Accuracy and radiation dose reduction using low-voltage computed tomography coronary artery calcium scoring with tin filtration Am J Cardiol 119 675-680

[14] Viamonte M(2019)Half-dose coronary artery calcium scoring: impact of iterative reconstruction J Thorac Imaging 34 18-25

[15] Detrano R(2018)The impact of dose reduction on the quantification of coronary artery calcifications and risk categorization: a systematic review J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 12 352-363

[16] Voros S(2014)SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 8 342-358

[17] Rivera JJ(2018)Cardiac-specific conversion factors to estimate radiation effective dose from dose-length product in computed tomography JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 11 64-74

[18] Berman DS(2019)Reduced radiation dose with model based iterative reconstruction coronary artery calcium scoring Eur J Radiol 111 1-5

[19] Patel AA(2014)Low-vs. standard-dose coronary artery calcium scanning Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16 358-363

[20] Fine J(2012)Low radiation coronary calcium scoring by dual-source CT with tube current optimization based on patient body size J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 6 113-120