DEDUCTIVE REASONING TO TEACH NEWTON’S LAW OF MOTION

被引:0
作者
Han Su Lee
Jongwon Park
机构
[1] Chonnam National University,Department of Physics Education, College of Education
[2] Chonnam National University,undefined
来源
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education | 2013年 / 11卷
关键词
conceptual change; deductive reasoning; force and motion; Newton’s law; teaching strategy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Finding out about and then understanding the forces acting on a moving object, based on a description of the change in motion of this object, is an important part of the conceptual understanding of Newton’s law of motion. Using Hempel’s deductive–normative model for scientific explanation, we developed a deductive explanation task (DET), and we applied this task in teaching students to improve their knowledge about force and motion. The results showed that many students received benefits and reached a good conceptual understanding by using the DET. Also, many students responded that learning physics through deductive thinking was less difficult, and in fact, this method of learning was even interesting. Based on the research results, we present some recommendations and suggestions for further study for more effective physics teaching.
引用
收藏
页码:1391 / 1414
页数:23
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Braaten M(2011)Working toward a stronger conceptualization of scientific explanation for science education Science Education 95 639-669
[2]  
Windschitl M(1998)An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35 623-654
[3]  
Chinn CA(2005)Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability American Journal of Physics 73 1172-1182
[4]  
Brewer WF(2004)Conscious knowledge of learning: Accessing learning strategies in a final year high school biology class International Journal of Science Education 26 1427-1443
[5]  
Coletta VP(1991)Students’ concepts of force as applied to related physical systems: A research for consistency International Journal of Science Education 13 97-113
[6]  
Phillips JA(1992)Motion implies force: Where to expect vestiges of the misconception? International Journal of Science Education 14 63-81
[7]  
Conner L(2000)Beyond conceptual change learning in science education focusing on transfer, durability and metacognition Educational Research 42 119-139
[8]  
Gunstone R(2004)Designing instructional examples to reduce intrinsic cognitive load: Molar versus modular presentation of solution procedures Instructional Science 31 33-58
[9]  
Finegold M(2008)Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ science, misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education Journal of Science Teacher Education 19 437-454
[10]  
Gorsky P(1998)Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses American Journal of Physics 66 64-74