Policy capacities and effective policy design: a review

被引:0
作者
Ishani Mukherjee
M. Kerem Coban
Azad Singh Bali
机构
[1] Singapore Management University,School of Social Sciences
[2] GLODEM,The School of Politics & International Relations; The Crawford School of Public Policy
[3] Koc University,undefined
[4] The Australian National University,undefined
来源
Policy Sciences | 2021年 / 54卷
关键词
Policy capacity; Policy effectiveness; Policy design; Policy success; Policy sciences; Policy instruments; Policy tools;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Effectiveness has been understood at three levels of analysis in the scholarly study of policy design. The first is at the systemic level indicating what entails effective formulation environments or spaces making them conducive to successful design. The second reflects more program level concerns, surrounding how policy tool portfolios or mixes can be effectively constructed to address complex policy objectives. The third is a more specific instrument level, focusing on what accounts for and constitutes the effectiveness of particular types of policy tools. Undergirding these three levels of analysis are comparative research concerns that concentrate on the capacities of government and political actors to devise and implement effective designs. This paper presents a systematic review of a largely scattered yet quickly burgeoning body of knowledge in the policy sciences, which broadly asks what capacities engender effectiveness at the multiple levels of policy design? The findings bring to light lessons about design effectiveness at the level of formulation spaces, policy mixes and policy programs. Further, this review points to a future research agenda for design studies that is sensitive to the relative orders of policy capacity, temporality and complementarities between the various dimensions of policy capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 268
页数:25
相关论文
共 235 条
[91]  
Howlett M(2018)Designing for sustainable outcomes: Espousing behavioural change into co-production programmes Policy and Society 2 115-257
[92]  
Howlett M(2017)Policy myopia as a source of policy failure: Adaptation and policy learning under deep uncertainty Policy and Politics 34 247-228
[93]  
Howlett M(2017)Policy capacity and evidence-based policy in the public service Public Management Review 34 219-235
[94]  
Howlett M(2019)Rethinking relationships: Clarity, contingency, and capabilities Policy Design and Practice 37 224-90
[95]  
Howlett M(2015)Making reform stick: Political acumen as an element of political capacity for policy change and innovation Policy and Society 30 66-83
[96]  
Capano G(2015)Policy capacity in public administration Policy and Society 96 70-518
[97]  
Ramesh M(2020)Can we be casual about being causal? Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 27 511-22
[98]  
Howlett M(2015)Governance and policy problems: Instruments as unitary and mixed modes of policy intervention Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 40 1-974
[99]  
Lejano RP(2013)Dispersed capacity and weak coordination: The challenge of climate change adaptation in Canada’s forest policy sector Review of Policy Research 15 957-252
[100]  
Howlett M(2018)Organizational reputation and risk regulation: The effect of reputational threats on agency scientific outputs Public Administration 53 243-632