Improving the outcome of salvage treatment for non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT)

被引:0
作者
J S de Bono
J Paul
A Simpson
A Anthoney
D Kirk
M Underwood
J Graham
S B Kaye
机构
[1] University of Glasgow,Department of Medical Oncology
[2] Western Infirmary,Department of Urology
[3] University of Glasgow,undefined
[4] Western Infirmary,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2000年 / 83卷
关键词
teratoma; relapse; salvage; prognosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Between 1991–96, 41 patients were treated in this unit for relapsed non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (NSGCT). Twenty-eight patients had raised markers at relapse: 17 required salvage chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy surgery, 11 only chemotherapy. In addition 9 patients received high dose chemotherapy. Overall 16/28 patients (57%) requiring chemotherapy remain alive, 14 (50%) disease free. Of the 17 patients treated with chemotherapy and surgery: 12 remain alive, 10 (59%) with no evaluable disease. Only 4/11 (36%) patients treated with chemotherapy alone remain alive, all in complete remission (CR). For relapse with raised markers, univariate analysis suggests that less than CR to induction therapy, resulting in the presence of residual disease is the most important predictor of poor outcome (P< 0.001). All of the 13 patients relapsing with normal markers remain alive, having been primarily treated surgically. Overall these results indicate an improving outlook for relapsed NSGCT. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 430
页数:4
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [1] Baniel J(1995)Late relapse of testicular cancer J Clin Oncol 13(5) 1170-1176
  • [2] Foster RS(1999)Gemcitabine in patients with relapsed or cisplatin-refractory testicular cancer J Clin Oncol 17(2) 512-516
  • [3] Gonin R(1997)Treatment of men with metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumours with cyclical POMB/ACE chemotherapy Ann Oncol 8(5) 477-483
  • [4] Messemer JE(1999)Impact of the treating institution on survival of patients with ‘poor-prognosis’ metastatic non-seminoma. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Tract Cancer Collaborative Group and the Medical Research Council Testicular Cancer Working Party J Natl Cancer Inst 91(10) 839-846
  • [5] Donohue JP(1999)Prognostic factors in patients with malignant non-seminomatous germ cell tumours relapsing after cisplatin based chemotherapy Br J Cancer 80(9) 1392-1399
  • [6] Einhom LH(1993)Management of malignant teratoma: does referral to a specialist unit matter? Lancet 341(8851) 999-1002
  • [7] Bokemeyer C(1997)Randomized trial of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin compared with bleomycin, etoposide, and carboplatin in good-prognosis metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell cancer: a Multi-institutional Medical Research Council/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial J Clin Oncol 15(5) 1844-1852
  • [8] Gerl A(1991)Long-term follow-up of non-seminomatous testicular cancer patients with mature teratoma or carcinoma at postchemotherapy surgery Eur J Cancer 27(6) 695-698
  • [9] Schoffski P(1998)Intensive induction-sequential chemotherapy with BOP/VIP-B compared with treatment with BEP/EP for poor-prognosis metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell tumour: a Randomized Medical Research Council/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer study J Clin Oncol 16(2) 692-701
  • [10] Harstrick A(1998)Vinblastine plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin as initial salvage therapy in recurrent germ cell tumor J Clin Oncol 16 2500-2504