HIV drug resistance against strand transfer integrase inhibitors

被引:0
作者
Kaitlin Anstett
Bluma Brenner
Thibault Mesplede
Mark A. Wainberg
机构
[1] McGill University,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine
[2] Jewish General Hospital,McGill AIDS Centre, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research
来源
Retrovirology | / 14卷
关键词
HIV; Resistance; Selections; Clinic; INSTIs; Raltegravir; Elvitegravir; Dolutegravir; Cabotegravir; Bictegravir;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are the newest class of antiretroviral drugs to be approved for treatment and act by inhibiting the essential HIV protein integrase from inserting the viral DNA genome into the host cell’s chromatin. Three drugs of this class are currently approved for use in HIV-positive individuals: raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (EVG), and dolutegravir (DTG), while cabotegravir (CAB) and bictegravir (BIC) are currently in clinical trials. RAL and EVG have been successful in clinical settings but have relatively low genetic barriers to resistance. Furthermore, they share a high degree of cross-resistance, which necessitated the development of so-called second-generation drugs of this class (DTG, CAB, and BIC) that could retain activity against these resistant variants. In vitro selection experiments have been instrumental to the clinical development of INSTIs, however they cannot completely recapitulate the situation in an HIV-positive individual. This review summarizes and compares all the currently available information as it pertains to both in vitro and in vivo selections with all five INSTIs, and the measured fold-changes in resistance of resistant variants in in vitro assays. While the selection of resistance substitutions in response to RAL and EVG bears high similarity in patients as compared to laboratory studies, there is less concurrence regarding the “second-generation” drugs of this class. This highlights the unpredictability of HIV resistance to these inhibitors, which is of concern as CAB and BIC proceed in their clinical development.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 435 条
  • [31] Carayon K(2012)Characterization of the R263K mutation in HIV-1 integrase that confers low-level resistance to the second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor dolutegravir J Virol 86 2696-774
  • [32] Delelis O(2016)Development of a G118R mutation in HIV-1 integrase following a switch to dolutegravir monotherapy leading to cross-resistance to integrase inhibitors J Antimicrob Chemother 71 1948-291
  • [33] Simon F(2008)Broad antiretroviral activity and resistance profile of the novel human immunodeficiency virus integrase inhibitor elvitegravir (JTK-303/GS-9137) J Virol 82 764-365
  • [34] Tauc P(2016)Differences among HIV-1 subtypes in drug resistance against integrase inhibitors Infect Genet Evol. 46 286-662
  • [35] Zubin E(2008)Subgroup and resistance analyses of raltegravir for resistant HIV-1 infection N Engl J Med 359 355-222
  • [36] Passos DO(2012)The development of novel HIV integrase inhibitors and the problem of drug resistance Curr Opin Virol. 2 656-176
  • [37] Li M(2008)Selection of diverse and clinically relevant integrase inhibitor-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mutants Antivir Res. 80 213-286
  • [38] Yang R(2011)Resistance to raltegravir highlights integrase mutations at codon 148 in conferring cross-resistance to a second-generation HIV-1 integrase inhibitor Antivir Res. 91 167-748
  • [39] Rebensburg SV(2010)Dynamic escape of pre-existing raltegravir-resistant HIV-1 from raltegravir selection pressure Antivir Res. 88 281-704
  • [40] Ghirlando R(2013)Safety and efficacy of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects with raltegravir-resistant HIV type 1 infection: 24-week results of the VIKING Study J Infect Dis 207 740-2880