Numerical instabilities and convergence control for convex approximation methods

被引:0
作者
Dixiong Yang
Pixin Yang
机构
[1] Dalian University of Technology,Department of Engineering Mechanics
[2] State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment,undefined
来源
Nonlinear Dynamics | 2010年 / 61卷
关键词
Convex approximation methods; Numerical instabilities; Chaotic dynamics; Convergence control; Stability transformation method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Convex approximation methods could produce iterative oscillation of solutions for solving some problems in structural optimization. This paper firstly analyzes the reason for numerical instabilities of iterative oscillation of the popular convex approximation methods, such as CONLIN (Convex Linearization), MMA (Method of Moving Asymptotes), GCMMA (Global Convergence of MMA) and SQP (Sequential Quadratic Programming), from the perspective of chaotic dynamics of a discrete dynamical system. Then, the usual four methods to improve the convergence of optimization algorithms are reviewed, namely, the relaxation method, move limits, moving asymptotes and trust region management. Furthermore, the stability transformation method (STM) based on the chaos control principle is suggested, which is a general, simple and effective method for convergence control of iterative algorithms. Moreover, the relationships among the former four methods and STM are exposed. The connection between convergence control of iterative algorithms and chaotic dynamics is established. Finally, the STM is applied to the convergence control of convex approximation methods for optimizing several highly nonlinear examples. Numerical tests of convergence comparison and control of convex approximation methods illustrate that STM can stabilize the oscillating solutions for CONLIN and accelerate the slow convergence for MMA and SQP.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 622
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Fleury C.(1986)Structural optimization: a new dual method using mixed variables Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 23 409-428
[2]  
Braibant V.(1987)A mathematical convergence analysis for the convex linearization method for engineering design optimization Eng. Optim. 11 195-216
[3]  
Nguyen V.H.(1990)A note on step-size restrictions in approximation procedure for structural optimization Comput. Struct. 37 259-263
[4]  
Strodiot J.J.(1987)The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 24 359-373
[5]  
Fleury C.(1989)CONLIN: an efficient dual optimizer based on convex approximation concepts Struct. Optim. 1 81-89
[6]  
Jonsson O.(1989)First and second order convex approximation strategies in structural optimization Struct. Optim. 1 3-10
[7]  
Larsson T.(1993)Extended method of moving asymptotes based on second-order information Struct. Optim. 5 175-183
[8]  
Svanberg K.(1993)A globally convergent version of the method of moving asymptotes Struct. Optim. 6 166-174
[9]  
Fleury C.(2002)A class of globally convergent optimization methods based on conservative convex separable approximations SIAM J. Optim. 12 555-573
[10]  
Fleury C.(1997)A modification of convex approximation methods for structural optimization Comput. Struct. 64 89-95