Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials

被引:0
作者
Jigisha Patel
机构
[1] Biomed Central Ltd,
来源
BMC Medicine | / 12卷
关键词
Peer review; Evidence based medicine; EBM; Randomized controlled trials; RCT; Clinical training; Medical education; Reporting guidelines; CONSORT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [1] Bero L(1995)The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care JAMA 274 1935-1938
  • [2] Rennie D(1997)Cholesterol lowering with simvastatin improves prognosis of diabetic patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) Diabetes Care 20 614-620
  • [3] Pyŏrälä K(1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement JAMA 276 637-639
  • [4] Pedersen TR(2004)Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors N Engl J Med 351 1250-1251
  • [5] Kjekshus J(2006)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals J R Soc Med 99 178-82
  • [6] Faergeman O(1998)Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: a randomized trial JAMA 280 234-237
  • [7] Olsson AG(1999)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations: a randomised trial BMJ 318 23-27
  • [8] Thorgeirsson G(1999)Opening up BMJ peer review BMJ 318 4-2786
  • [9] Begg C(2013)Re-review opt out and painless publishing BMC Biology 11 18-161
  • [10] Cho M(2002)Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review JAMA 287 2784-514