Prognostic factors for patients after curative resection for proximal gastric cancer

被引:0
作者
Donghui Zhao
Huimian Xu
Kai Li
Zhe Sun
机构
[1] First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University,Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Unit of General Surgery, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncosurgery
来源
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] | 2010年 / 30卷
关键词
stomach neoplasms; proximal gastric cancer; curative resection; prognosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The factors influencing the long-term survival of patients with proximal gastric cancer (PGC) after curative resection were investigated. Data from 171 patients who underwent curative resection for PGC were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were grouped according to the clinicopathological factors and operative procedures. The tumor depth (T stage) and lymph node metastasis (pN stage) were graded according to the fifth edition of TNM Staging System published by UICC in 1997. The metastatic lymph node ratio (MLR) was divided into four levels: 0%, <10%, 10%–30% and >30%. The data of survival rate were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method (log-rank test) and Cox regression model. The 5-year overall survival rate of 171 patients was 37.32%. The univariate analysis demonstrated that the survival time of the postoperative patients with PGC was related to tumor size (χ2=4.57, P=0.0325), gross type (χ2=21.38, P<0.001), T stage (χ2=27.91, P<0.001), pN stage (χ2=44.72, P<0.001), MLR (χ2=61.12, P<0.001), TNM stage (χ2=44.91, P<0.001), and range of gastrectomy (χ2=4.36, P=0.0368). Multivariate analysis showed that MLR (χ2=10.972, P=0.001), pN stage (χ2=6.640, P=0.010), TNM stage (χ2=7.081, P=0.007), T stage (χ2=7.687, P=0.006) and gross type (χ2=6.252, P=0.012) were the independent prognostic factors. In addition, the prognosis of patients who underwent total gastrectomy (TG) was superior to that of patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy (PG) for the cases of tumor ≥5 cm (χ2=6.31, P=0.0120), Borrmann III/IV (χ2=7.96, P=0.0050), T4 (χ2=4.57, P=0.0325), pN2 (χ2=5.52, P=0.0188), MLR 10%–30% (χ2=4.46, P=0.0347), MLR >30% (χ2=13.34, P=0.0003), TNM III (χ2=14.05, P=0.0002) or TNM IV stage (χ2=4.37, P=0.0366); and combining splenectomy was beneficial to the cases of T3 (χ2=5.68, P=0.0171) or MLR >30% (χ2=6.11, P=0.0134). It was concluded that MLR, pN stage, TNM stage, T stage, and gross type had advantages in providing a precise prognostic evaluation for patients undergoing curative resection for PGC, in which MLR was the most valuable index. TG and combining splenectomy were useful to improve the prognosis to patients with PGC of TNM III/IV stage, serosa invasion, or extensive regional lymph node metastasis.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 535
页数:5
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Volpe C.M.(2000)Outcome of patients with proximal gastric cancer depends on extent of resection and number of resected lymph nodes Ann Surg Oncol 7 139-144
  • [2] Driscoll D.L.(2006)Surgical outcomes for gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach World J Surg 30 1870-1876
  • [3] Douglass H.O.(1992)Time trends in gastric carcinoma: changing patterns of type and location Am J Gastroenterol 87 572-579
  • [4] Kim J.H.(1995)Problem of proximal third gastric carcinoma World J Surg 19 523-531
  • [5] Park S.S.(2006)Epidemiology of gastric cancer World J Gastroenterol 12 354-362
  • [6] Kim J.(2007)Trends in tumor location in gastric carcinoma over a 28-year period Hepatogastroenterology 54 1297-1301
  • [7] Craanen M.E.(2008)Prognostic impact of metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric cancer from cardia and fundus World J Gastroenterol 14 4383-4388
  • [8] Dekker W.(2000)Proximal versus distal gastric carcinoma — what are the differences? Ann Surg Oncol 7 520-525
  • [9] Blok P.(2001)Proximal compared with distal gastric cancer: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors Am Surg 67 697-703
  • [10] Siewert J.R.(2006)Comparison of results of surgery in the upper third and more distal stomach J Gastrointest Surg 10 718-726