Action or attention in social inhibition of return?

被引:0
|
作者
Silviya P. Doneva
Mark A. Atkinson
Paul A. Skarratt
Geoff G. Cole
机构
[1] University of Essex,Department of Psychology, Centre for Brain Science
[2] University of Exeter,Department of Psychology
[3] University of Hull,Department of Psychology
来源
Psychological Research | 2017年 / 81卷
关键词
Stimulus Onset Asynchrony; Simon Effect; Mirror Neuron System; Attentional Orienting; Target Side;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When two individuals alternate reaching responses to targets located in a visual display, reaction times are longer when responses are directed to where the co-actor just responded. Although an abundance of work has examined the many characteristics of this phenomenon it is not yet known why the effect occurs. In particular, some authors have argued that action representation mechanisms are central to the effect. However, here we present evidence in support of an account in which the representation of action is not necessary. First, the basic effect occurs even when participants cannot see their co-actor’s movement but, importantly, have their attention shifted to a target side via an attentional cue. Second, its time course is too short-lasting to function effectively as a component of action planning. Finally, unlike other joint action phenomena, the effect is not modulated by higher order mechanisms concerned with the personal attributes of a co-actor. Taken together, these results suggest that this particular joint action phenomenon is due to attentional rather than action mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 54
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Inhibition of return and reflexive attention to gaze direction.
    Friesen, CK
    Kingstone, A
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, : 94 - 94
  • [32] The role of attention in the facilitation effect and another "inhibition of return"
    Okamoto-Barth, Sanae
    Kawai, Nobuyuki
    COGNITION, 2006, 101 (03) : B42 - B50
  • [33] Orienting of attention and Parkinson's disease: tactile inhibition of return and response inhibition
    Poliakoff, E
    O'Boyle, DJ
    Moore, AP
    McGlone, FP
    Cody, FWJ
    Spence, C
    BRAIN, 2003, 126 : 2081 - 2092
  • [34] Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation
    Sapir, A
    Soroker, N
    Berger, A
    Henik, A
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 2 (12) : 1053 - 1054
  • [35] Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return
    Jan Theeuwes
    Richard Godijn
    Perception & Psychophysics, 2002, 64 : 764 - 770
  • [36] The effect of bimodal divided attention on inhibition of return with audiovisual targets
    Tang Xiaoyu
    Sun Jiaying
    Peng Xing
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA SINICA, 2020, 52 (03) : 257 - 268
  • [37] The pupillary light response reflects exogenous attention and inhibition of return
    Mathot, Sebastiaan
    Dalmaijer, Edwin
    Grainger, Jonathan
    Van der Stigchel, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2014, 14 (14):
  • [38] Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation
    Ayelet Sapir
    Nachum Soroker
    Andrea Berger
    Avishai Henik
    Nature Neuroscience, 1999, 2 : 1053 - 1054
  • [39] New perceptual objects that capture attention produce inhibition of return
    Heather M. Oonk
    Richard A. Abrams
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1998, 5 : 510 - 515
  • [40] OBJECT-CENTERED INHIBITION OF RETURN OF VISUAL-ATTENTION
    TIPPER, SP
    DRIVER, J
    WEAVER, B
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 43 (02): : 289 - 298