Sacral nerve stimulation to treat nonobstructive urinary retention in women

被引：14
作者：
Comiter C.V. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Urology, Stanford University, School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305
来源：
Current Urology Reports | 2008年 / 9卷 / 5期
关键词：
Urinary Retention; Sacral Nerve Stimulation; Urethral Sphincter; Sacral Neuromodulation; Urethral Diverticulum;
D O I：
10.1007/s11934-008-0069-1
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Nonobstructive urinary retention is an uncommon finding in women that may represent a difficult management problem for urologists and patients. Pharmacotherapy and urethral dilatation are rarely successful, and clean intermittent catheterization may be cumbersome. Those patients who cannot self-catheterize may be subjected to an indwelling catheter. Sacral nerve stimulation is a minimally invasive treatment for nonobstructive urinary retention, with 10 years of data documenting its long-term safety and efficacy. This minimally invasive treatment can restore satisfactory voiding in most patients and should be a routine part of treatment for this rare but important condition. Copyright © 2008 by Current Medicine Group LLC.
引用
收藏
页码：405 / 411
页数：6
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] DasGupta R., Critchley H.D., Dolan R.J., Fowler C.J., Changes in brain activity following sacral neuromodulation for urinary retention, J Urol, 174, pp. 2268-2272, (2005)
  • [32] Comiter C.V., Sacral neuromodulation for the symptomatic treatment of interstitial cystitis, J Urol, 169, pp. 1369-1373, (2003)
  • [33] Jarrett M.E., Neuromodulation for constipation and fecal incontinence, Urol Clin North Am, 32, pp. 79-87, (2005)
  • [34] Janknegt R.A., Weil E.H., Eerdmans P.H., Improving neuromodulation technique for refractory voiding dysfunctions: Two-stage implant, Urology, 49, pp. 358-362, (1997)
  • [35] Kessler T.M., Madersbacher H., Kiss G., Prolonged sacral neuromodulation testing using permanent leads: A more reliable patient selection method?, Eur Urol, 47, pp. 660-665, (2005)
  • [36] Everaerdt K., Kerckhaerdt W., Caluwaerdts H., Et al., A prospective randomized trial comparing the 1-stage with the 2-stage implantation of a pulse generator in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction selected for sacral nerve stimulation, Eur Urol, 45, pp. 649-654, (2004)
  • [37] Jonas U., Fowler C.J., Chancellor M.B., Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for urinary retention: Results 18 months after implantation, J Urol, 165, pp. 15-19, (2001)
  • [38] Dasgupta R., Wiseman O.J., Kitchen N., Fowler C., Long-term results of sacral neuromodulation for women with urinary retention, BJU Int, 94, pp. 335-337, (2004)
  • [39] van Kerrebroeck P.E., van Voskuilen A.C., Heesakkers J.P., Et al., Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: Outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study, J Urol, 178, pp. 2029-2034, (2007)
  • [40] van Voskuilen A., Oerlemans D.J., Weil E.H., Et al., Long term results of neuromodulation by sacral nerve stimulation for lower urinary tract symptoms: A retrospective single center study, BJU Int, 99, pp. 107-110, (2007)
12345