Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex

被引:0
作者
Dean T. Jeffery
Jonathan A. Norton
Francois D. Roy
Monica A. Gorassini
机构
[1] University of Alberta,Centre for Neuroscience and Department of Biomedical Engineering
[2] University of Alberta,513 Heritage Medical Research Centre, Centre for Neuroscience
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2007年 / 182卷
关键词
Tibialis anterior; Corticospinal tract; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Anodal; Cathodal; tDCS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the human motor cortex at an intensity of 1 mA has been shown to be efficacious in increasing (via anodal tDCS) or decreasing (via cathodal tDCS) the excitability of corticospinal projections to muscles of the hand. In this study, we examined whether tDCS at currents of 2 mA could effect similar changes in the excitability of deeper cortical structures that innervate muscles of the lower leg. Similar to the hand area, 10 min of stimulation with the anode over the leg area of the motor cortex increased the excitability of corticospinal tract projections to the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, as reflected by an increase in the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. MEP amplitudes recorded at rest and during a background contraction were increased following anodal tDCS and remained elevated at 60 min compared to baseline values by 59 and 35%, respectively. However, in contrast to the hand, hyperpolarizing cathodal stimulation at equivalent currents had minimal effect on the amplitude of the MEPs recorded at rest or during background contraction of the TA muscle. These results suggest that it is more difficult to suppress the excitability of the leg motor cortex with cathodal tDCS than the hand area of the motor cortex.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 287
页数:6
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
Agnew WF(1987)Considerations for safety in the use of extracranial stimulation for motor evoked potentials Neurosurgery 20 143-147
[2]  
McCreery DB(1997)Input–output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway Exp Brain Res 114 329-338
[3]  
Devanne H(2002)Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury Neuron 34 831-840
[4]  
Lavoie BA(2006)A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury Pain 122 197-209
[5]  
Capaday C(2003)Surround inhibition Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 56 153-159
[6]  
Fraser C(2005)Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke Brain 128 490-499
[7]  
Power M(2006)Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? Lancet Neurol 5 708-712
[8]  
Hamdy S(2005)Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals Neurology 64 872-875
[9]  
Rothwell J(2002)Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability Brain 125 2238-2247
[10]  
Hobday D(1991)Behavioral deficits induced by local injection of bicuculline and muscimol into the primate motor and premotor cortex J Neurophysiol 65 1542-1553