Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstructions Do Not Improve the Interobserver Reliability of the AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association and Young and Burgess Pelvic Fracture Classifications

[1] Tile M(1980)Pelvic disruption: Principles of management Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 151 56-64

[2] Pennal GF(2018)Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018 Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 32 S1-S170

[3] Meinberg EG(1986)Pelvic fractures: Value of plain radiography in early assessment and management Radiology 160 445-451

[4] Agel J(2008)Interobserver reliability of the Young-Burgess and tile classification systems for fractures of the pelvic ring Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 22 379-384

[5] Roberts CS(2019)The intra- and interobserver reliability of the Tile AO, the Young and Burgess, and FFP classifications in pelvic trauma Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 139 645-650

[6] Young JW(2009)Classification of pelvic fractures: Analysis of inter- and intraobserver variability using the Young-Burgess and tile classification systems Orthopedics 32 401-1401

[7] Burgess AR(2013)The imaging and classification of severe pelvic ring fractures: Experiences from two level 1 trauma centres The Bone and Joint Journal 95 1396-164

[8] Brumback RJ(2020)Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional computed tomographies in the classification of acetabular fractures Emergency Radiology 27 157-S33

[9] Poka A(2007)Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 21 S1-856

[10] Koo H(1990)Pelvic ring disruptions: Effective classification system and treatment protocolsand Journal of Trauma 30 848-46

[1] Tile M(1980)Pelvic disruption: Principles of management Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 151 56-64

[2] Pennal GF(2018)Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018 Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 32 S1-S170

[3] Meinberg EG(1986)Pelvic fractures: Value of plain radiography in early assessment and management Radiology 160 445-451

[4] Agel J(2008)Interobserver reliability of the Young-Burgess and tile classification systems for fractures of the pelvic ring Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 22 379-384

[5] Roberts CS(2019)The intra- and interobserver reliability of the Tile AO, the Young and Burgess, and FFP classifications in pelvic trauma Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 139 645-650

[6] Young JW(2009)Classification of pelvic fractures: Analysis of inter- and intraobserver variability using the Young-Burgess and tile classification systems Orthopedics 32 401-1401

[7] Burgess AR(2013)The imaging and classification of severe pelvic ring fractures: Experiences from two level 1 trauma centres The Bone and Joint Journal 95 1396-164

[8] Brumback RJ(2020)Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional computed tomographies in the classification of acetabular fractures Emergency Radiology 27 157-S33

[9] Poka A(2007)Fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 21 S1-856

[10] Koo H(1990)Pelvic ring disruptions: Effective classification system and treatment protocolsand Journal of Trauma 30 848-46