Risk-based standards: Integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches

被引:45
作者
Linkov I. [1 ]
Anklam E. [2 ]
Collier Z.A. [1 ]
DiMase D. [3 ]
Renn O. [4 ]
机构
[1] United States Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Concord, MA
[2] Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, European Commission's Joint Research Centre, Geel
[3] G-19A Test Laboratory Standards Development Committee, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA
[4] University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart
关键词
Cybersecurity; Nanotechnology; Policy; Resilience; Risk assessment; Risk management; Security;
D O I
10.1007/s10669-014-9488-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In response to rapidly changing threats posed to increasingly complex socio-technical systems, many in the government and private sector have called for protection through risk-based standards. However, given the nature of these dynamic and uncertain threats, traditional risk assessment techniques may not be sufficient. Instead, there is a critical need for an integrated approach in which decision analytic techniques are used to assess evidence-based data with the values and preferences of decision makers. We point to three examples in the fields of nuclear power regulation, nanotechnology, and cybersecurity, where risk-based approaches (bottom-up) have been combined with decision analysis (top-down) to guide decision makers toward risk management policies that manifest both the best available evidence and the plurality of values within a society. © 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA).
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 137
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Aebi U., Anklam E., Baun A., Donaldson K., Fadeel B., Fears R., Gehr P., Kreyling W., Krug H., Kuhlbusch T.A.J., Monard D., Riediker M., Stamm H., Joint JRC-EASAC Report impact of engineered nanomaterials on health: Considerations for benefit-risk assessment, (2011)
[2]  
Aven T., Renn O., The role of quantitative risk assessments for characterizing risk and uncertainty and delineating appropriate risk management options, with special emphasis on terrorism risk, Risk Anal, 29, 4, pp. 587-600, (2009)
[3]  
(2013)
[4]  
Kaplan S., Garrick B.J., On the quantitative definition of risk, Risk Anal, 1, pp. 11-17, (1981)
[5]  
Linkov I., Moberg E., Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: Environmental Applications and Case Studies, (2012)
[6]  
Linkov I., Bates M.E., Canis L.J., Seager T.P., Keisler J.M., A decision-directed approach for prioritizing research into the impact of nanomaterials on the environment and human health, Nat Nanotechnol, 6, pp. 784-787, (2011)
[7]  
Park J., Seager T.P., Rao P.S.C., Convertino M., Linkov I., Integrating risk and resilience approaches to catastrophe management in engineering systems, Risk Anal, 33, 3, pp. 356-367, (2012)
[8]  
Renn O., Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World, (2008)
[9]  
Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments, pp. 800-830, (2012)
[10]  
A proposed risk management regulator framework, (2012)